Truth, Trust and Temporality: climate communication in times of emergency
Introduction
The importance of climate education is increasingly emphasized in relation to the addressed social transformation (IPCC, COP 26). There is a pronounced need for new ways to communicate climate issues and science to invite creative ways of thinking, and new stories of the future. Hence, there is a need to study how climate change takes shape in different contexts and groups, to better understand how environmental sciences are used in climate communication (Corner, et.al. 2017). An interesting entrance to this, is how social movements of environmental activists communicate about the climate crises. Since 2018 new social movements of activists addressing the climate and ecological crises has rapidly grown (e.g. Friday For Futures, and Extinction Rebellion “XR”). This study rests on the assumption that the different ways we live and act, also relates to what we know and how we experience the world around us. With inspiration of Barad’s (2007) Agential Realism this study explores discourses of phenomena through “agential cuts” by applying a diffractive analysis to actions of XR.
Research Questions
How may agential cuts make nourishing understanding of new ways in communication of climate and social change, from a grassroots movement as Extinction Rebellion?
o In what way might these results inform and be relevant to formal education?
Methodology
Creating knowledge about the climate crises involves more than education of natural and social sciences. This means being attentive to the ways in which our knowledge and the material dimensions of the world around us, the social orders we live by, and the normative values we share are all intertwined (Barad, 2007). In a diffractive analysis it is the relational result that are of interest. Accordingly, exploring agential cuts involves looking for contrasts and connections, and is not about representation or classification. Barad (2007) points out that, close attention is paid to detail in a diffractive analysis, to the intra-actions and to the possibilities for new ideas to evolve. The empirical data consists of texts, interviews, course material and field observations from XR's actions during 2021, collected with respect to the ethical principles of research.
Findings
The initial findings discuss how generative agential cuts through phenomena as; “time”, “truth” and “trust”, create assemblages of different understanding. As an example, time generate different meaning of the urgency or emergency of climate change due to temporalities of time. Anthropocene, term of office government, planetary boundaries, tipping points are some of these temporalities giving different meaning of the climate crises in relation to truth and trust.
Conclusion & Recommendation for theory and practice
How we allow ourselves to see the world in new ways can be crucial in creating opportunities to address the challenges posed by climate change. Attention of how we understand the world, may create attention of values, inspiration, and visions to create new stories for the future.
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the
entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Corner, A., Shaw, C. & Clarke, J. (2017). Communicating Environmental and Sustainability Science - Challenges, opportunities, and the changing political context. A Knowledge Report for Mistra. Oxford: Climate Outreach.
Haraway, D. (2017). Staying with the trouble. Making Kin with the Chthulucene London: Duke University Press.