In the past several years, there has been a growing research interest in students’ opportunities to engage in and develop disciplinary literacies through writing. Mirroring developments in other countries, the Swedish national curriculum has required teaching with a more disciplinary focus since 2011. This puts various demans on students' writing, such as constructing arguments based on source material and explaining causes and consequences of historical events. The presentation will focus on test-related writing practices in history teaching in Grade 6 in a Swedish school located in a socially disadvantaged and linguistically diverse area.
The presentation is based on research aiming to contribute knowledge about how students negotiate literacy expectations when writing answers to test questions in the teaching of history. The research questions are:
Which literacy expectations are conveyed by the written questions administered to the students in a final test and in activities leading up to the test?
How can the students written answers be understood in relation to the literacy expectations in the question posed to them?
Ethnographically inspired methods were used to document teaching activities, teaching material and students' text in a content area about the early modern period in Swedish history. The study spanned three months. Previous publications from this study have focused on the classroom interaction and the text material used in the teaching (e.g., Author, 2020; Author & Colleague, 2021). This presentation instead focuses on students' written responses to test questions based on 102 collected tests. The analysis was informed by disciplinary literacy and systemic-functional genre theory. It particularly draws on the discourse semantic system of periodicity (Martin & Rose, 2007) to highlight how the students manage the information flow in their texts, for example by introducing, unpacking and re-stating abstract and subject-related concepts. Another important point of reference is the learner's pathway through the genres of history (e.g., Coffin, 1997) which charts the progression from chronological recounts to explanatory texts that rely on causality.
The findings show that the literacy expectations increased between homework tests used to preprare the students for a final test and the final test itself. While the homework tests expected the students to reproduce information about historical events and persons in the text material they studied, the final test required them to reason about events in terms of causes and consequences. The students mostly responded to this shift by adding more information about the events in an unplanned manner. However, some students managed to adapt their writing to accommodate the scaled-up demands by using a more planned approach to the writing and adjusting the information flow to accentuate the consequences and historical significance of events. On rare occasions, students used strategies which went beyond the written language, such as incorporating relevant information coveyed orally by a teacher and using multimodal representations. However, most of the students based their writing on a text material that provided limited input for the complex writing expected of them in the final test. Implications for classroom practice include the importance of modelling successful subject-specific writing strategies as well as providing sufficiently rich disciplinary input, through various modes, that the students can use for their written output. It follows that the writing must be understood as part of a disciplinary literacy practice.
Coffin, C. (1997). Construing and giving value to the past: an investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and schools (pp. 196-230). Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
Walldén, R. (2020). "It was that Trolle thing" Negotiating history in grade 6: A matter of teachers' text choice. Linguistics and Education, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100884
Walldén, R., & Nygård Larsson, P. (2021). “Can you take a wild guess?” Using images and expanding knowledge through interaction in the teaching and learning of history. Linguistics and Education, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100960