Climate change has resulted in several actors in various industries starting to take into account how their business activities affect the environment. The Swedish Parliament has set a climate target that is intended to be achieved by 2045. More specifically, the goal means that Sweden should have no net emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. In 2019, Sweden's construction and real estate sector accounted for nationwide greenhouse gas emissions, corresponding to approximately 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, which means that the specified sector can have a major impact on the environment.
Climate declarations are a term used in various contexts that report a building's climate impact. Climate declarations are carried out only for the construction stage, of which it has been divided into two subcategories: the product stage (A1-A3) and the construction production stage (A4-A5) (Boverket, 2021). The study illustrates how the process can be done when producing climate declarations. In addition, a template has been designed that shows how much carbon dioxide equivalents building elements emit.
The study consisted of interview questions that were answered by six different companies with different roles and similar views in sustainable construction. The respondents that have been interviewed in the study are sales engineer Krister Andersson from the company Ruukki, environmental and sustainability manager Alexandra Rosenqvist from Beijer Byggmaterial, business development manager Linda Hedvall from Lindab, chief executive officer Oscar Hoolmé from Jacob Lindh AB and constructor Samir Goralija from Areco Profiles. Furthermore, structured interview questions have been prepared and asked to the above-mentioned companies, such as how do companies stand before the climate declaration act? What measures will be taken to comply with the law? How has the law been affected in the business and what measures will be taken both short- and long-term?
The companies that have been interviewed point out that an EPD is only based on the construction phase of the A-module at present. The companies want a complete EPD with modules from A-D where the entire life cycle analysis is taken into account. This is in order to get a clearer picture of how much carbon dioxide equivalents a hallbuilding generates.
Within the framework of the study, the template has also been tested on an industrial building located in Eslöv municipality. The template was used to calculate how much carbon dioxide equivalents a hallbuildings climate screen generates.
The results showed that the entire building's climate screen emits 58,065 kilo of carbon dioxide equivalents. Furthermore, it was shown that both traditional wall (41 kilo carbon dioxide equivalents per m2) and traditional roof (42 kilo carbon dioxide equivalents per m2) produce lower emissions than sandwich wall (60 kilo carbon dioxide equivalents per m2) and cardboard roof (71 kilo carbon dioxide equivalents per m2).
The problem with the production of climate declarations is that today's climate database is unclear and that different construction companies apply different climate indicators, which makes it hard to compare. Another problem is that climate declarations only apply to the construction phase (A-module). This means that the rest of the building's life cycle assessment has not been taken into account, which delays the process of achieving specified climate goals.
The conclusion is thus that the process of producing a climate declaration is something new since there are no clear guidelines for how inputs should be chosen. However, it was shown that the supplier can with use of generic values can reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. This is done by choosing the right combination between building elements.