Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Increased rent misspent?: How ownership matters for renovation and rent increases in rental housing in Sweden
RISE Res Inst Sweden, Div Built Environm, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0979-8859
RISE Res Inst Sweden, Div Built Environm, Gothenburg, Sweden.
RISE Res Inst Sweden, Div Built Environm, Gothenburg, Sweden; Lund Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Bldg & Environm Technol, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7568-3334
2025 (English)In: International journal of housing policy, ISSN 1949-1247, E-ISSN 1949-1255, Vol. 25, no 1, p. 78-100Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Renovations of the housing rental stock have become a political concern since they have been claimed to drive gentrification and affect tenants' everyday lives as well as long-term housing conditions. Furthermore, new actors have entered the market, partly as a result of high supply on the international capital markets creating a flow of capital into market segments. This has led to a critique of private equity in the housing sector, and raised the question of the extent to which ownership of the rental stock matters for housing affordability. Yet there seems to be little systematic research on this topic. This study uses a unique dataset covering the entire rental housing stock in Sweden to address whether there are differences in renovation investments between different ownership groups. The purpose of this article is to increase understanding of how ownership affects renovation processes, and specifically to analyse to what extent, and how, private and public actors differ in renovation and rent setting decisions. Our results demonstrate that public housing companies raised rents less and renovated more, particularly in the lower-income segments of the multi-family building stock between 2014 and 2020.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025. Vol. 25, no 1, p. 78-100
Keywords [en]
Commercialisation, financialisation, ownership, renovation, affordable housing, rents
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-62428DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2023.2232205ISI: 001043205700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85166927309OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-62428DiVA, id: diva2:1796642
Available from: 2023-09-13 Created: 2023-09-13 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2169 kB)129 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2169 kBChecksum SHA-512
1000bbaab589442891fc50f6c8c3a33868db15a9543ded3cf08298aee4ca13d13fa4ae8cfb3f741e291ca35857dc34ddf514fe1786d300b8dfbae661368cc914
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Bohman, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bohman, Helenavon Platten, Jenny
By organisation
Department of Urban Studies (US)
In the same journal
International journal of housing policy
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 129 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 228 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf