Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mechanical Property Assessment of Bone Healing around a Titanium-Zirconium Alloy Dental Implant
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 16, no 6, p. 913-919Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundIt has been reported that titanium-zirconium alloy with 13-17% zirconium (TiZr1317) implants show higher biomechanical stability and bone area percentage relative to commercially pure titanium (cpTi) grade 4 fixtures. PurposeThis study aimed to determine whether the higher stability for TiZr1317 implants is associated with higher mechanical properties of remodeling bone in the areas around the implants. Materials and MethodsThis study utilized 36 implants (n=18: TiZr1317, n=18: cpTi), which were placed in the healed ridges of the mandibular premolar and first molar of 12 mini pigs (n=3 implants/animal). After 4 weeks in vivo, the samples were retrieved, and resin-embedded histologic sections of approximately 100m in thickness were prepared. In order to determine the nanomechanical properties, nanoindentation (n=30 tests/specimen) was performed on the bone tissue of the sections under wet conditions with maximum load of 300N (loading rate: 60N/s). ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) elastic modulus (E) and hardness (H) for the TiZr1317 group were 2.73 +/- 0.50GPa and 0.116 +/- 0.017GPa, respectively. For the cpTi group, values were 2.68 +/- 0.51GPa and 0.110 +/- 0.017GPa for E and H, respectively. Although slightly higher mechanical properties values were observed for the TiZr1317 implants relative to the cpTi for both elastic modulus and hardness, these differences were not significant (E=p>0.75; H=p>0.59). ConclusionsThe titanium-zirconium alloy used in this study presented similar degrees of nanomechanical properties to that of the cpTi implants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 16, no 6, p. 913-919
Keywords [en]
animal model, biomechanics, bone, dental, endosteal implants, nanoindentation
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-39247DOI: 10.1111/cid.12061ISI: 000347039400012PubMedID: 23527994Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84922768412OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-39247DiVA, id: diva2:1518968
Available from: 2021-01-18 Created: 2021-01-18 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jimbo, Ryo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Anchieta, Rodolfo B.Jimbo, RyoCoelho, Paulo G.
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 62 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf