Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ameloblastic fibroma and ameloblastic fibrosarcoma: a systematic review
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Department of Histopathology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK; School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
2018 (English)In: Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, ISSN 0904-2512, E-ISSN 1600-0714, Vol. 47, no 4, p. 315-325Article, review/survey (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Purpose. To integrate the available data published to date on ameloblastic fibromas (AF) and ameloblastic fibrosarcomas (AFS) into a comprehensive analysis of their clinical/radiologic features. Methods. An electronic search was undertaken in July/2017. Eligibility criteria included publications having enough clinical, radiological and histological information to confirm a definite diagnosis. Results. 244 publications (279 central AF tumours, 10 peripheral AF, 103 AFS) were included. AF and AFS differed significantly with regard to the occurrence of patients’ mean age, bone expansion, cortical bone perforation and lesion size. Recurrence rates were: central AF (19.2%), peripheral AF (12.5%), AFS (all lesions, 35%), primary (de novo) AFS (28.8%), secondary AFS (occurring after an AF, 50%). Larger lesions and older patients were more often treated by surgical resections for central AF. Segmental resection resulted in the lowest rate of recurrence for most of the lesion types. AFS treated by segmental resection had a 70.5% lower probability to recur (OR 0.295; p=0.049) than marginal resection. 21.3% of the AFS-patients died due to complications related to the lesion. Conclusions. Very long follow-up is recommended for AF lesions, due to the risk of recurrence and malignant change into AFS. Segmental resection is the most recommended therapy for AFS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2018. Vol. 47, no 4, p. 315-325
Keywords [en]
Ameloblastic fibroma, Ameloblastic fibrosarcoma, Odontogenic tumors, Clinical features, Recurrence rate
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-16187DOI: 10.1111/jop.12622ISI: 000430125800001PubMedID: 28776760Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85028608053Local ID: 23318OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-16187DiVA, id: diva2:1419703
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1122 kB)737 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1122 kBChecksum SHA-512
ec9e01e52935ac163a43e0f744d7faf385dc224946550df72afc5b0711245eea789254d0d1ea3f865a168329f624e5746388c4a53fc700bfb180b3d10071a077
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopushttp://rdcu.be/vN0f/

Authority records

Chrcanovic, Bruno

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chrcanovic, Bruno
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 739 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 289 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf