Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The effect of marginal bone level changes on the stability of dental implants in a short-term evaluation
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
2015 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 26, no 10, p. 1185-1190Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

ObjectivesTo evaluate whether changes in marginal bone level (MBL) around implants, in sites with different bone types, affect the over time implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Material and methodsSeventy-eight implants were inserted into jawbones of 32 patients using a two-stage surgical protocol, and implant bone sites were grouped according to the Lekholm and Zarb bone classification. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured by RFA at four time points: implant placement, uncovering, rehabilitation, and at 1-year follow-up after loading. The MBL was measured on periapical radiographs at uncovering and at 1-year follow-up. Percent change in bone level was calculated based on the difference between the implant length and height from the crestal bone level to the implant apex. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and repeated-measures ANOVA were used for data analysis. ResultsSignificant improvement of ISQ was found between implant insertion and uncovering surgery (P<0.001), while no significant changes were detected throughout the remaining follow-up period. The greatest improvement of ISQ was observed for bone type 4, compared with the other groups (P<0.001). Percent change in bone level had no effect on longitudinal measures of ISQ (P=0.337). The ISQ difference between uncovering and 1year after loading was not correlated with percent change in bone level (r=0.16; P=0.157). ConclusionThere was increased implant stability after implant placement, but it was not affected by changes in marginal bone level during the first year of loading.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Vol. 26, no 10, p. 1185-1190
Keywords [en]
bone implant interaction, clinical assessment, diagnosis, prosthodontics
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15454DOI: 10.1111/clr.12426ISI: 000360769200011PubMedID: 24893883Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84940954410Local ID: 20036OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15454DiVA, id: diva2:1418975
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindh, Christina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindh, Christina
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf