Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Oral cavity anaerobic pathogens in biofilm formation on voice prostheses
Division of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8279-7943
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Division of Phoniatrics–Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Division of Phoniatrics–Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Head and Neck, ISSN 1043-3074, E-ISSN 1097-0347, Vol. 37, no 4, p. 524-529Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method has been used to identify oral anaerobic pathogens in biofilms on voice prostheses. The purpose of the present study was to determine the location of those pathogens inside the biofilms. METHODS: Biofilms of 15 voice prostheses were sampled and used to identify the oral pathogens. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was applied on smears made on glass slides and on sections of intact biofilms visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). RESULTS: Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) was the most frequently detected pathogen and the only tested species detected in microcolonies. The other microbes (Parvimonas micra [P. micra], Porphyromonas gingivalis [P. gingivalis], Tannerella forsythia [T. forsythia], and Treponema denticola [T. denticola]) were not detected or only detected as single cells. CLSM analysis showed that F. nucleatum resided on the biofilm surface. CONCLUSION: Although detectable, oral anaerobic pathogens seem to be no more than passers-by that adhere without further observed proliferation and apparently play no striking role in biofilm formation on voice prostheses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Vol. 37, no 4, p. 524-529
Keywords [en]
anaerobic pathogens, biofilm architecture, confocal laser scanning microscopy, fluorescence in situ hybridization, periodontitis
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15350DOI: 10.1002/hed.23625ISI: 000351690800013PubMedID: 24677258Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925670885Local ID: 19914OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15350DiVA, id: diva2:1418871
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bertl, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bertl, Kristina
In the same journal
Head and Neck
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf