Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Blogs plus Twitter = Change? Discursive reproduction of global governance and the limits of social media
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), School of Arts and Communication (K3).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5783-8427
2014 (English)In: Popular Representations of Development: Insights From Novels, Films, Television and Social Media / [ed] David Lewis, Dennis Rodgers, Michael Woolcock, Routledge, 2014, p. 195-212Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

No other popular medium in recorded history has penetrated public life as rapidly as Internet-based social media. Research on the impact of their use has, however, focused mainly on crisis contexts (see, for example, Farrell and Drezner, 2008; Maratea, 2008; Etling et al., 2010), including especially the ‘Arab Spring’ (see, for example, Breuer, 2012; Howard and Parks, 2012; Shirky, 2011; Aday et al., 2010). Only one study so far has investigated their effects on economic policy-making (McKenzie and Özler, 2011). In light of this empirical dearth, we seek to demonstrate that incorporating analyses of social media content into research on international development policy formulation is a promising avenue for understanding the reproduction of elite-driven practices of global governance more generally. At the same time, our chapter also provides an opportunity to critically appraise recent assertions that social media has contributed to the formation and sustenance of a global civil society (Thörn, 2007). By focusing on social media coverage of the 2010 United Nations High-Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals (MDG Summit) in New York City, we present an empirical case and explore its ramifications for the reproduction of exclusive networks in global policymaking. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2014. p. 195-212
Series
Rethinking Development
Keywords [en]
Communication, Planning & Development
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-9101ISI: 000365670500011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84918922893Local ID: 27610ISBN: 978-0-415-82281-7 (print)ISBN: 978-0-203-55324-4 (electronic)ISBN: 978-0-415-82280-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-9101DiVA, id: diva2:1406133
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

ScopusFulltext

Authority records

Denskus, Tobias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Denskus, Tobias
By organisation
School of Arts and Communication (K3)
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf