Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of salivary contamination during placement of implants with simultaneous bony augmentation in iliac bone in sheep
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3454-7202
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0730-1020
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9144-3442
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2893-3676
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN 0266-4356, E-ISSN 1532-1940, Vol. 57, no 10, p. 1131-1136Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Our aim was to investigate the possible impact of contamination with saliva on osseointegration during placement of implants with simultaneous bone augmentation. Six hemispheric shape bone defects (8mm in diameter×4mm deep) were prepared in each iliac bone of six sheep. A dental implant (2.9mm in diameter×10mm long) was placed in the centre of each defect, and then pairs of defects were filled with one of the following bone augmentation materials: autogenous bone, autogenous bone plus bovine bone, or resorbable biphasic ceramic bone substitute. One site in each augmentation group was impregnated with saliva (contaminated group), while the other was not (non-contaminated group). Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) within implant threads were measured after a healing period of five weeks, both in respect of the implant inserted in the augmented bone and in that inserted in the residual bone. Overall results showed that there was a significant difference between the contaminated and non-contaminated group for BIC in the augmented implant (p=0.028), while there were no significant differences in the implant in residual bone (p=0.722). For BAFO, there were no significant differences between the contaminated and non-contaminated groups among the different augmentation materials. The results showed that contamination with saliva during placement of an implant with simultaneous bone augmentation had a serious deleterious effect on osseointegration of the aspect of the implant within the augmented defect. Contamination with saliva during placement of an implant with simultaneous bone augmentation should therefore be avoided.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 57, no 10, p. 1131-1136
Keywords [en]
dental implants, osseointegration, surgery, contamination, saliva
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6531DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.10.302ISI: 000502529300033PubMedID: 31672257Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85074442909Local ID: 30473OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6531DiVA, id: diva2:1403474
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2025-08-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jinno, YoheiJohansson, KristerStocchero, MicheleToia, MarcoGalli, SilviaStavropoulos, AndreasBecktor, Jonas P

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jinno, YoheiJohansson, KristerStocchero, MicheleToia, MarcoGalli, SilviaStavropoulos, AndreasBecktor, Jonas P
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf