Malmö University Publications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Incidence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split osteotomy alone or combined with genioplasty
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD). Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital MAS, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Folktandvard, Nyhem, Halmstad, Sweden.
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD). Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital MAS, Malmö 205 02, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2004 (English)In: British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN 0266-4356, E-ISSN 1532-1940, Vol. 42, no 2, p. 105-111Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We mailed questionnaires to all patients who had had sagittal split osteotomies alone (n= 84) or in combination with genioplasty (n = 37) between 1995 and 2000, to find out the incidence of postoperative sensory disturbances. The patients with sagittal split osteotomies alone reported sensory disturbance in 48/131 (37%) operated sides. When combined with genioplasty patients experienced them in 20/54 (37%) operated sides. The incidences were 36/101 (36%) for mandibular advancement and 12/30 (40%) for mandibular setback. Out of the patients with sagittal split osteotomies alone, 59/66 (89%) were satisfied with the result of the operation, and when combined with the genioplasty the corresponding figure was 23/27 (85%). We conclude that differences in the incidence of sensory disturbance after sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement and setback were not significant. The combination with genioplasty did not increase the incidence of sensory disturbance. Sensory changes after the osteotomies do not serve to be the main determinant of the patients' satisfaction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2004. Vol. 42, no 2, p. 105-111
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6476DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2003.12.002ISI: 000220502500003PubMedID: 15013541Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-1642485729Local ID: 3035OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6476DiVA, id: diva2:1403419
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2025-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sunzel, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sunzel, Bo
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 178 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf