Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Relationship between buccal bone and gingival thickness revisited using non-invasive registration methods
Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 27, no 5, p. 523-528Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between buccal bone and soft tissue thickness at teeth in the premaxilla by means of non-invasive registration methods. Materials and MethodsBuccal bone thickness at central incisors, lateral incisors and canines was measured at five reference points (1-5mm from the top of the alveolar crest) on CB-CT scans of 21 patients. The corresponding buccal gingival thickness was measured by the use of an ultrasonic device. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between buccal bone and soft tissue thickness at each tooth type ResultsMean buccal bone thickness (SD) at central incisors, lateral incisors and canines was 1.07mm (0.34mm), 1.16mm (0.54mm) and 0.98mm (0.37mm), respectively. For central incisors, 68% of all sites had a thickness <1mm and 32% had a thickness between 1.0 and 2.0mm. At lateral incisors, 44% demonstrated buccal bone thickness between 0 and 1.0mm, 48% between 1.0 and 2.0mm and 8% 2mm. For canines, 57% of the sites were <1mm thick; 41% were between 1.0 and 2.0mm thick, and 2% demonstrated 2mm thickness. Mean gingival thickness (SD) at central incisors, lateral incisors and canines was 1.37mm (0.32mm), 1.33mm (0.32mm) and 1.08mm (0.25mm), respectively. The correlation between buccal bone and soft tissue thickness was moderately positive (=0.406; P<0.001 ConclusionsA thin buccal bone wall (<1mm) may be expected in over half of the central incisors and canines. The correlation between buccal bone and soft tissue thickness was moderately positive

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Munksgaard, 2016. Vol. 27, no 5, p. 523-528
Keywords [en]
buccal bone, CB-CT, periodontal biotype, soft tissue, ultrasonic device
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6437DOI: 10.1111/clr.12618ISI: 000374699200002PubMedID: 26010518Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84930077240Local ID: 23032OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6437DiVA, id: diva2:1403380
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Cosyn, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cosyn, Jan
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf