Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patient evaluation after treatment with maxillary implant-supported overdentures
Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
2006 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 8, no 1, p. 39-43Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare outcome among patients after implant overdenture treatment in the maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample comprised two groups of patients: group 1, in which the patients were planned for overdenture treatment, and group 2, in which the patients originally were planned for a fixed prosthesis in the maxilla but had overdenture treatment owing to implant failures, resulting in an insufficient number of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. All patients treated with maxillary implant-supported overdentures in the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skovde, Sweden, between 1993 and 2002 received a questionnaire at their yearly follow-up visit with nine questions related to their treatment. All questions had visual analogue scale response alternatives ranging from a negative to a positive opinion. RESULTS: Nineteen patients, 10 in group 1 and 9 in group 2, completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 86%. Both groups expressed a high satisfaction rate, and few regretted their choice of treatment. Patients planned for overdenture treatment (group 1) reported significantly fewer speech problems after treatment compared with those originally planned for a fixed prosthesis (group 2, p < .05). No other significant differences between the two groups were seen. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that maxillary implant overdenture treatment may be considered a viable option among patients with an insufficient number of implants for a fixed prosthesis

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 8, no 1, p. 39-43
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-5736DOI: 10.2310/j.6480.2005.00029.xISI: 000237261700005PubMedID: 16681492Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33744931674Local ID: 3516OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-5736DiVA, id: diva2:1402605
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-05-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Söderfeldt, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderfeldt, Björn
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf