Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical decision-making during 5 years of antipsychotic treatment
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Health and Society (HS).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9227-8987
Department of Psychiatry, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Neuroscience-Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
2007 (English)In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum, ISSN 0065-1591, E-ISSN 1600-5473, Vol. 116, no s435, p. 17-26Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Explore how clinicians select drug treatment based on symptoms, side effects and patient factors, including patient participation in the process, and the association between these factors and attitudes towards drugs.

Method: A cohort of 166 patients initially treated with risperidone was followed with yearly assessments over 5 years. At the end of the study, 101 patients were evaluated of whom 58 were still treated with risperidone.

Results: More women than men remained in the study, and on the initial medication. The most common reason for medication switch was lack of efficacy. Clinicians and patients agreed well in their global ratings of medication effects and side effects. Robust associations between switch decisions and patient characteristics including symptoms and side effects could not be identified. The effects of switches were rated as better by the clinicians than by the patients. Negative drug attitudes were associated with pronounced positive symptoms (threshold effect), whereas the corresponding association with 'lack of judgment and insight' was linear over the whole range.

Conclusion: The decision-making process appears to have many unknown components, and may benefit from more active patient involvement by using structured clinician and patient rating scales for monitoring the treatment. Such shared decision-making may improve compliance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Munksgaard, 2007. Vol. 116, no s435, p. 17-26
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-5381DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01084.xISI: 000251503800003PubMedID: 17953522Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-35449005978Local ID: 5481OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-5381DiVA, id: diva2:1402236
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2025-06-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Levander, Sten

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Levander, Sten
By organisation
Faculty of Health and Society (HS)
In the same journal
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf