Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of a questionnaire to measure patient reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
FACMI, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Statistics, Swedish Business School, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice, ISSN 1356-1294, E-ISSN 1365-2753, Vol. 15, no 3, p. 411-419Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In this study we describe the development of a short, easy-to-use questionnaire to measure postoperative recovery and evaluate its content validity and intra-patient reliability. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate the progress of postoperative recovery and the long-term follow-up of possible effects of interventions during recovery. METHODS: The study involved four steps. (1) A conceptualization and item definitions were based on a theoretical framework and a description of patients' postoperative recovery from the perspective of patients, registered nurses and surgeons; (2) Content validity of items was tested through expert judgements; (3) A test run of the questionnaire was performed to confirm its feasibility and workload requirement; and (4) The stability of the questionnaire was evaluated through intra-patient reliability assessment. RESULTS: As a result of the operationalization process of the concept postoperative recovery, five dimensions (physical symptoms, physical functions, psychological, social, activity) and 19 items were identified. Each item was formulated as a statement in the questionnaire. Content validity was judged to be high. After the pre-test of the questionnaire a revision with refinements in the layout was made. The vast majority of items showed a high level of intra-patient reliability. CONCLUSION: Based on a theoretical framework and empirical data, we developed a short and easy-to-use tentative questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery. Initial support for content validity was established. The vast majority of items showed a high level of test-retest reliability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 15, no 3, p. 411-419
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-4190DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01027.xISI: 000266425900002PubMedID: 19366398Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-66249086918Local ID: 8904OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-4190DiVA, id: diva2:1401020
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Idvall, Ewa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Idvall, Ewa
In the same journal
Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf