Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diabetes and oral implant failure: a systematic review
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD). Department of Biomaterials, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5719-0157
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2957-1133
2014 (English)In: Journal of Dental Research, ISSN 0022-0345, E-ISSN 1544-0591, Vol. 93, no 9, p. 859-867Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether there are any effects of diabetes mellitus on implant failure rates, postoperative infections, and marginal bone loss. An electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken in March 2014. The present review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies. The search strategy resulted in 14 publications. The I (2) statistic was used to express the percentage of total variation across studies due to heterogeneity. The inverse variance method was used for the random effects model when heterogeneity was detected or for the fixed effects model when heterogeneity was not detected. The estimates of an intervention for dichotomous outcomes were expressed in risk ratio and in mean difference in millimeters for continuous outcomes, both with a 95% confidence interval. There was a statistically significant difference (p = .001; mean difference = 0.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.08, 0.31) between diabetic and non-diabetic patients concerning marginal bone loss, favoring non-diabetic patients. A meta-analysis was not possible for postoperative infections. The difference between the patients (diabetic vs. non-diabetic) did not significantly affect implant failure rates (p = .65), with a risk ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval = 0.80, 1.44). Studies are lacking that include both patient types, with larger sample sizes, and that report the outcome data separately for each group. The results of the present meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the presence of uncontrolled confounding factors in the included studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2014. Vol. 93, no 9, p. 859-867
Keywords [en]
Diabetes mellitus, Blood glucose, Dental implants, Infection, Periodontal bone loss, Meta-analysis
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-964DOI: 10.1177/0022034514538820ISI: 000342770400005PubMedID: 24928096Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84908029466Local ID: 18021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-964DiVA, id: diva2:1397645
Available from: 2020-02-27 Created: 2020-02-27 Last updated: 2025-10-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Chrcanovic, BrunoAlbrektsson, TomasWennerberg, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chrcanovic, BrunoAlbrektsson, TomasWennerberg, Ann
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Dental Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 120 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf