Reports indicate a decrease in youth mental health in Sweden but at the same time research suggests that what is interpreted as mental ill-health could be considered everyday challenges by young people themselves. The distribution of mental health and illness among young people is uneven based on inequities related to factors such as race, gender and socioeconomic status. Sweden in particular is a country with large socioeconomic inequities in youth mental health and in school results, compared to other European countries. The aim of this study was to explore young people's experiences of the role of race, gender and socioeconomic status in relation to everyday challenges. Sixty-five young people aged 13–15 years old were recruited by student health services and participated in focus group discussions at schools in the southernmost part of Sweden. Data were analysed by secondary analysis with deductive qualitative content analysis using Ecosocial theory of disease distribution as theoretical framework. The analysis resulted in one main theme; Navigating inequities to gain and keep social status, with three underlying themes; Guided by social norms, Negative impact in everyday life and Importance of family influence. Participants were aware and critical of norms and expectations related to race, gender and socioeconomic status. Experiences of prejudice and unfairness was both own lived experiences by the participants as well as observed through friends and classmates. Young people spontaneously identify everyday challenges related to race, gender and socioeconomic status, even when not asked directly about these issues. Conforming to sexist, racist and classist, expectations is a way to lose and gain status in a school setting. Many of the inequities discussed related to socioeconomic status and the direct consequences of having or not having money. Young people's everyday experience of inequities is important to consider in youth mental health promotion aiming to tackle health inequities. Further research is needed on those experiences and how this affects mental health.

Background: Everyday challenges and stress negatively affect young people's mental health. Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with different stressors and different stress-coping mechanisms. Many interventions target youth mental health, but few consider socioeconomic differences in the planning, implementation, or evaluation. In a Swedish context socioeconomic status is related with migration experience. The aim of the study was to explore proposals for tackling everyday challenges among young people from different socioeconomic neighborhoods.

Methods: Eight focus groups, with participants between 13 and 15 years old from eight schools, were conducted in the south of Sweden. The participants discussed proposals for tackling everyday challenges. Using comparative thematic analysis, the focus group transcripts were divided into two groups, based on the socioeconomic status of the school's neighborhood, and analyzed comparatively. Most of the participants in low SES neighborhoods had foreign background and most of the participants in high SES neighborhoods were Swedish born.

Results: The analysis resulted in four shared themes between the two SES groups: society is responsible, school is responsible, parents are responsible, and I am responsible. The differences and similarities between the two groups are presented in sub-themes. Many of the proposals were similar between the two SES groups, but with different underlying issues and examples.

Conclusion: Both groups proposed that adults must listen more to young people in order to improve the everyday challenges young people face. However, the low SES group in general expressed both more frustration and more agency, compared to the high SES group. This could be important to consider when planning school-based mental health promotion in different socioeconomic neighborhoods.

The goal of Swedish public health policy is to create conditions that enable good and equitable health and eliminate avoidable health inequities. Although previous research emphasizes the importance of considering inequities in mental health promotion and policy, and although researchers and policy makers emphasize the importance of a system-approach to mental health, there seems to be an ambiguity in how the concept of equity is understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to critically examine equity and inequity discourses in Swedish regional action plans for mental health. A critical discourse analysis based on Foucault’s discourse theory was used to reveal discursive practices of inequity. Twenty-two regional action plans for mental health were analyzed. The analysis identified three discourse strands: the vague language of equity, the inequitable people, and education as a pathway to equity, all of which are entangled through the individualization of equity. Overall, the equity discourse was interpreted as representing a naturalistic and liberal view on equity. This could be understood as contributing to upholding the system of inequities rather than dismantling it. There is a need for clarification about the considered causes of mental health inequities as well as possible solutions.

Introduction: Mental ill-health affects young people being marginalized to a greater extent than other young people. Nevertheless, are groups being marginalized underrepresented in health research and practice. Several models regarding youth participation have been developed, but knowledge is still lacking on how health promotion practitioners can equitably involve young people when developing health promotion efforts.

Aim: This study aims to (1) describe how participatory action research was used to develop a model for practitioners to equitably involve young people in mental health promotion initiatives and (2) present the finalized model, Steps Towards Justice.

Methods: Through a participatory action research approach, a group of practitioners constructed a model for an equitable involvement of young people in mental health promotion. The model was developed further together with focus groups of practitioners and young people.

Results: The finalized model consists of three phases: preparing, conducting, and applying, with different steps of action to be taken in each phase. To identify inclusion and exclusion, practitioners need to be critical and aware of their own prejudice and values throughout the process. The practice of involving young people equitably also includes creating safe spaces and valuing young people of different backgrounds equally in their contribution to mental health promotion.

Conclusion: The model can be useful for practitioners wanting to involve young people when planning and conducting mental health promotion, for instance at schools or youth centers. It can foster the process of critical reflection around equitable practices and taking steps toward justice through concrete actions of involvement, moving beyond a vague discourse of “everyone is welcome.”