This research delves into the actions taken under the Tidö Agreement to address gang-related crime in Sweden. In times there has been a rise, in incidents like shootings and bombings posing challenges to national security and impacting international relations. The study examines three suggestions; employing witnesses implementing tougher penalties for gang offenders and setting up security zones. By evaluating these policy suggestions the goal of this study is to determine their effectiveness, in decreasing criminal activities. The bills are analyzed through three different theories, namely the rational choice theory, rational choice institutionalism and the theory of social bonds. The study takes into account the arguments for and against which are presented for each bill. Finally, recommendations for future policy-making and legal practice are presented. These recommendations aim to optimize the effectiveness of legislation while ensuring that fundamental human rights are not violated. The results of the study underscore the importance of well-informed legal strategies that can be adapted to the dynamic and often unpredictable landscape of gang crime.