Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The phenomenographic outcome space of nurse educators' conception of nursing students collaboration in clinical skills lab
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0749-5718
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8884-1490
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0077-9061
2025 (English)In: Nurse Education Today, ISSN 0260-6917, E-ISSN 1532-2793, Vol. 152, article id 106775Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: This study aimed to understand the variety of nurse educators' conceptions of nursing students' collaboration in clinical skills lab activities.

BACKGROUND: Collaborative learning has gained attention in nurse education as an educational approach that supports learning and professional development. However, research is deficient concerning nurse educators in faculty-based education and their conceptions of student collaboration.

METHOD: The study adopted a phenomenographic approach. A purposeful sampling of nurse educators teaching in a skills lab setting was conducted at five universities in Sweden. Individual interviews with sixteen nurse educators were performed between November 2023 and February 2024. The interviews were analysed following phenomenographic procedures.

RESULTS: Four different description categories were identified: the purpose of collaboration, the didactic activities for collaboration, the student's intrapersonal skills, and the group activity skills. The outcome space presents the purpose of collaboration as the most complex descriptive category.

CONCLUSION: The educational purpose of collaboration should be settled by the faculty of nurse education and aligned to the collaborative requirements in the nursing profession. Introducing didactic activities specifically contextualized to the nursing profession and including peer observations and feedback in a formative manner may facilitate the development of collaboration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2025. Vol. 152, article id 106775
Keywords [en]
Collaboration, Collaborative learning, Individual interviews, Nurse educators, Nursing students, Phenomenography, Skills lab
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-75818DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106775ISI: 001490527100002PubMedID: 40347730Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105004362725OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-75818DiVA, id: diva2:1957762
Available from: 2025-05-12 Created: 2025-05-12 Last updated: 2025-06-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Collaboration in clinical skills lab: perspectives from students and educators in nurse education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Collaboration in clinical skills lab: perspectives from students and educators in nurse education
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to explore the collaboration and the collaborative process between bachelor nursing students during clinical skills lab practices from the perspective of nursing students and nurse educators and the use of formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programs.

In the first study, an exploration of formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programs was carried out by mapping the existing research literature in the field. After critical appraisal of the literature, a thematic analysis was performed. The results revealed a process consisting of two consecutive phases. The first phase involved the rationale for formative peer assessment, which was to support student learning as preparation for the healthcare professions. The second phase concerned the organization and the structure of the formative peer assessment activity and how the complexity of collaboration between the students affected their relationships with each other. The revealed complexity of peer collaboration influenced the aim of the subsequent empirical qualitative studies because similar results have been described in previous studies in connection with collaborative learning activities.

The second and third studies explored how first-year bachelor nursing students collaborate as well as the collaborative process during practice in clinical skills labs. Fieldwork with participant observations and focus group interviews was performed. Thematic network analysis was carried out in the second study, and a narrative analysis of fieldnotes and transcribed focus groups interviews was conducted in the third study to analyse the collaborative process. In the fourth study, interviews were performed with nurse educators with teaching experiences from clinical skills labs. The aim was to understand their different conceptions of nursing students’ collaboration. The transcribed interviews were analysed with a phenomenographic approach.

The findings from the second study showed that collaboration between nursing students is a field of tension between adaptation and non-conformity. Adaptation represents the students’ ability to adapt to new knowledge, to each other, and to being a nursing student. The non-conformity in the collaboration corresponds to students’ difficulties in accepting the perspective of others, finding mutual goals, sharing decisions, and providing supportive and constructive feedback to each other.

In the third study a sequential process was identified in the exploration of the collaborative process between the nursing students. The initial period was characterized by navigating in unfamiliar territory, which included anxieties related to not being involved, not being familiar with the context, and not being sure of the expectations. Over time, the students started to navigate together to cope in response to the complexities of the tasks they had ahead of them. To overcome these complexities, they looked for people like themselves, which led to homogenous groups. At the end of their training period the students were approaching independence in anticipation of their future nursing profession. In this period the role of the educator became less prominent, and the students mostly relied on each other’s knowledge. The feedback they provided to each other became constructive with suggestions for improvement. The focus was now on the task at hand, and with whom it was practiced was of less importance.

In the final study, the nurse educators’ various conceptions of nursing students’ collaboration described an outcome space that indicated that the purpose of collaboration was the most complex descriptive category that formed the didactive activities related to collaboration, the nursing students’ interpersonal skills, and the group activity skills.

Conclusively, and reflected in Vygotsky’s theory of Zone of Proximal Development, the collaboration between the nursing students during skills lab practices shows that the students’ collaboration can develop from a zone of current development to a collective zone of proximal development with support from their peers. For education to support the students’ transition to independence, the educational purpose of collaboration needs to be defined by the faculty. The collaboration needs to be guided by scaffolding activities contextualized to the nursing profession and adjusted to where the students are in the collaborative process. Instructional directives for peer observations and feedback along with didactive activities might decrease anxiety and complexity in collaborative learning and thereby prepare students for the crucial collaboration that takes place in the nursing profession.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö University Press, 2025. p. 78
Series
Malmö University Health and Society Dissertations, ISSN 1653-5383, E-ISSN 2004-9277 ; 2025:5
Keywords
clinical skills lab, collaboration, collaborative learning, nurse educators, nursing students, the Zone of proximal development
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-74750 (URN)10.24834/isbn.9789178776191 (DOI)978-91-7877-618-4 (ISBN)978-91-7877-619-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-04-11, Allmänna sjukhuset, HS aula, Jan Waldenströms gata 25, Malmö, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Paper 4 in disseration as manuscript.

Available from: 2025-03-20 Created: 2025-03-17 Last updated: 2025-05-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(525 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 525 kBChecksum SHA-512
70c3d8a750f892f7c174325c90e674e0c98794f4bb2dd848c4d9e830ddc2faabbd5a231d5beed69fcb09d26dc0ddee305f6c97f6f8f8805bf4e05d2e56bf87d1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Stenberg, MarieBengtsson, MarietteMangrio, ElisabethCarlson, Elisabeth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenberg, MarieBengtsson, MarietteMangrio, ElisabethCarlson, Elisabeth
By organisation
Department of Care Science (VV)
In the same journal
Nurse Education Today
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf