Malmö University Publications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implicit and Explicit Grammar Instruction: A study on teachers’ perceptions of the effects and benefits of implicit and explicit instruction on L2 learners’ grammar knowledge
Malmö University, Faculty of Education and Society (LS).
2025 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This study explores perceptions of explicit and implicit grammar instruction among in-service teachers and their students in upper-secondary schools in Sweden. This is a vital topic given continuous discussions over optimal language teaching methods. A mixed methods research approach was adopted, incorporating qualitative semi-structured interviews with six in-service teachers in Sweden and a quantitative questionnaire administered to their students. Findings revealed that some teachers preferred implicit grammar instruction combined with Focus on Meaning (FoM) approach, emphasizing natural language acquisition through communicative tasks. Moreover, some teachers also favored explicit, Form-Focused Instruction (FFI), citing its structured approach, time efficiency, and suitability for mixed-ability classrooms. The remaining teachers preferred a mix of implicit and explicit grammar instruction, highlighting its flexibility in addressing diverse learner needs and its effectiveness in balancing grammatical accuracy with communicative fluency. Similarly, students expressed a preference for a blend of methods, appreciating explicit instruction for clarity and engaging implicit activities for contextual practice. These findings show the importance of combining both explicit and implicit grammar instruction to cater to varied learning preferences and optimize language proficiency outcomes. Future research should further examine the combination of both methods since limited quantitative studies have been conducted on this topic.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. , p. 74
Keywords [en]
implicit, explicit, grammar instruction
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-73372OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-73372DiVA, id: diva2:1933476
Educational program
LS English and Education: Master's Programme (Two-Year)
Presentation
2024-08-26, 10:00 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2025-01-31 Created: 2025-01-31 Last updated: 2025-01-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(564 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 564 kBChecksum SHA-512
fdd8bc14316e923350ffdb3e7d2e61ebe5839cdf58c76b21b66c54c63d85ed46623a6dd3879b18b82d14968c9220457441c424b5c98051f092b5570538e13086
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amirjanli, Gunay
By organisation
Faculty of Education and Society (LS)
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf