Malmö University Publications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Engineering organs, hopes and hybridity: considerations on the social potentialities of xenotransplantation
Independent, Kottmar, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2103-4643
School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5985-193X
Department of Sociology, University of York, York, UK.
Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), School of Social Sciences and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9948-783X
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Medical Humanities, ISSN 1468-215X, E-ISSN 1473-4265Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The development of replacing human organs with those from genetically modified pigs holds immense potential for alleviating the shortage of organs necessary for patients in need of transplants. This medical advancement is also accompanied by significant social changes, including the emergence of a bioeconomy, new modes of biotechnology governance, altered human-animal relations and increased public engagement. Some aspects, such as the impact on the transplant allocation system, effects on clinical practice and healthcare provision, global trajectories and most importantly the consequences for patients and their families remain unpredictable. Given that xenotransplantation occurs within a societal context and its success or failure will not be confined to technical feasibility alone, it is essential to engage a social sciences perspective to highlight the social implications and emphasise the importance of social research in accompanying future developments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2024.
Keywords [en]
xenotransplantation, biotechnology, risk, researcher, policy process
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
Health and society studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-72883DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013061ISI: 001383219500001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-72883DiVA, id: diva2:1923865
Funder
German Research Foundation (DFG), SFB-TRR 127Available from: 2025-01-01 Created: 2025-01-01 Last updated: 2025-01-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(421 kB)9 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 421 kBChecksum SHA-512
164611be81d5a8d362e2e77fe382cc97b949eaac9728a6f8da35c1c67073fa8ef5ccb08d8f244482fbdde699b5486abe1a0615d9bffab8cd2bd13d89a8d85c63
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kögel, JohannesCook, Peta SClare, AmyHansson, KristoferLundin, Susanneá Rogvi, SofieSharp, Lesley A
By organisation
Department of Social Work (SA)
In the same journal
Medical Humanities
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 9 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 82 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf