Malmö University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is routine antibiotic prophylaxis warranted in dental implant surgery to prevent early implant failure? - a systematic review
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0904-9655
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5248-9202
Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Medical Unit of Plastic Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: BMC Oral Health, E-ISSN 1472-6831, Vol. 24, no 1, p. 842-, article id 842Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The question of whether antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered routinely for dental implant surgery is unresolved. Despite the lack of conclusive supportive evidence, antibiotics are often administered to reduce the risk of infection, which could lead to early implant failure. Increasing antibiotic resistance is a major concern and it is therefore important to reduce the overall use of antibiotics, including in dentistry. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative antibiotics in preventing early implant failure, in overall healthy patients undergoing dental implant surgery.

METHODS: , 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs). All RCTs comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with no antibiotics/placebo in overall healthy patients receiving dental implants were included. The primary outcome was patients with early implant failure. Risk of bias was assessed, data were extracted, a meta-analysis was done, and GRADE certainty-of-evidence ratings were determined. The risk ratio (RR), the risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 1086 abstracts were screened, and 17 articles were reviewed in full text. Seven RCTs with moderate or low risk of bias and with a total of 1859 patients and 3014 implants were included in the meta-analysis. With reference to early implant failure at patient level, the meta-analysis failed to disclose any statistically significant difference (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.30-1.47) between antibiotic prophylaxis and a placebo. The risk difference was -0.007 (95% CI: -0.035-0.020) leading to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 143.

CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental implant surgery does not seem to have any substantial effect on early implant failure ( ). The results do not support routine antibiotic prophylaxis for dental implant surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 24, no 1, p. 842-, article id 842
Keywords [en]
Antibiotic prophylaxis, Dental implants, Implant failure
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-70070DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04611-0ISI: 001277698900002PubMedID: 39054434Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199454401OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-70070DiVA, id: diva2:1886614
Available from: 2024-08-02 Created: 2024-08-02 Last updated: 2025-03-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implant surgery
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implant surgery
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implant surgery is intended to prevent postoperative infections and early implant failure, but its necessity, particularly in healthy patients undergoing straightforward procedures, remains controversial. While some dentists administer prophylaxis for all cases, others argue against routine use due to its minimal clinical benefit and the potential harm it causes by contributing to the rise of antibiotic resistance. This thesis evaluates the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in implant surgery, focusing on implant survival, infection prevention, administration patterns, and dentists’ decision-making processes. It includes a randomised clinical trial comparing a single preoperative dose of amoxicillin to placebo, a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing implant failure, a cross- sectional study on administration patterns among Swedish dentists, and a qualitative study exploring dentists’ perspectives. The findings show that routine antibiotic prophylaxis does not significantly reduce implant failure or postoperative infections in healthy patients, and that administration practices suggest that more antibiotics are prescribed than are needed, particularly in complex cases involving bone augmentation. Dentists recognise the risk of antibiotic resistance but often prioritise immediate infection prevention that may not be needed, contributing to the potential overuse of antibiotics. These findings underscore the urgent need for clearer, evidence-based guidelines to minimise unnecessary administration and strengthen antibiotic stewardship in dental implant surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö University Press, 2025. p. 88
Series
Malmö University Odontological Dissertations, ISSN 1650-6065, E-ISSN 2004-9307
National Category
Odontology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-74673 (URN)10.24834/isbn.9789178776139 (DOI)978-91-7877-612-2 (ISBN)978-91-7877-613-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-04-04, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö, 09:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Paper 2 and 3 in dissertation as manuscript. Not included in the full text online. 

Available from: 2025-03-13 Created: 2025-03-13 Last updated: 2025-03-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1937 kB)63 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1937 kBChecksum SHA-512
aa79aa04f9c9db556857c1e89711a691d7a1e40c63f50743e56b8239d45c999a44b0692a994f4fa0bfddaf5fe18d8a4014ad71b46884719bdbdb48599c19be47
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Momand, PalwashaNaimi-Akbar, AronGötrick, Bengt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Momand, PalwashaNaimi-Akbar, AronGötrick, Bengt
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
BMC Oral Health
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 63 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 166 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf