Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical outcomes of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia vs. porcelain-veneered zirconia fixed dental prosthesis, with an additional focus on the cement type: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
2023 (English)In: Clinical Oral Investigations, ISSN 1432-6981, E-ISSN 1436-3771, Vol. 27, no 10, p. 5755-5769Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To compare the failure rates and the prevalence of technical complications between full-coverage tooth-supported monolithic zirconia (MZ) and porcelain-veneered zirconia (PVZ) fixed dental prosthesis, based on a systematic literature review.

METHODS: An electronic search was performed in three databases, supplemented by hand searching. Several statistical methods were used.

RESULTS: Seventy-four publications reported 6370 restorations (4264 PVZ; 2106 MZ; 8200 abutment teeth; 3549 patients), followed up until 152 months. A total of 216 prostheses failed, and survival was statistically significant different between groups. PVZ had higher occurrence of complications than MZ; the difference was especially greater for either minor or major chipping. The difference in prevalence of either minor or major chipping was statistically significant for PVZ prostheses between cementation with glass ionomer and adhesive resin cement (higher), adhesive resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC, higher), and between RMGIC (higher) and glass ionomer cement. For MZ the difference was significant only for minor chipping between RMGIC (higher) and adhesive resin cement. Abutment teeth to PVZ prostheses more often lost vitality. Decementation was not observed with RMGIC. Air abrasion did not seem to clinically decrease the decementation risk. The 5-year difference in the occurrence of minor or major chipping between MZ and PVZ prostheses was statistically significant, but nor for catastrophic fracture.

CONCLUSION: Tooth-supported PVZ prostheses present higher failure and complication rates than MZ prosthesis. The difference in complications is striking when it comes to chipping.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Awareness of the outcome differences between different types of zirconia prostheses is important for clinical practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2023. Vol. 27, no 10, p. 5755-5769
Keywords [en]
Cement type, Cementation, Complications, Dental prosthesis, Failure, Monolithic zirconia, Porcelain-veneered zirconia, Systematic review, Tooth-supported prosthesis
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-62659DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05219-4ISI: 001060202700001PubMedID: 37626273Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85168925701OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-62659DiVA, id: diva2:1798238
Available from: 2023-09-18 Created: 2023-09-18 Last updated: 2023-10-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1154 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1154 kBChecksum SHA-512
89ba5f49f69930dcf54e765516ecd233bf381e2932b485ca21df6e39280a8f87b6904359c2e812540ba0eaf616c302e73864c9710fa991972b2dc49df99e5ef1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shihabi, ShahedChrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf