Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Governing urban diversity through myths of national sameness: a comparative analysis of Denmark and Sweden
Malmö University, Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare (MIM). Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Global Political Studies (GPS).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8968-9569
Malmö University, Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare (MIM). Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Global Political Studies (GPS).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7823-2221
2022 (English)In: Journal of Organizational Ethnography, ISSN 2046-6749, E-ISSN 2046-6757, Vol. 11, no 1, p. 5-19Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore problematisations of urban diversity in urban and integration policies in Denmark and Sweden; the paper aims to show how such policies express social imaginaries about the self and the other underlying assumptions of sameness that legitimise diverging ways of managing urban diversity and (re)organising the city. Design/methodology/approach Inspired by anthropology of policy and post-structural approaches to policy analysis, the authors approach urban and integration policies as cultural texts that are central to the organisation of cities and societies. With a comparative approach, the authors explore how visions of diversity take shape and develop over time in Swedish and Danish policies on urban development and integration. Findings Swedish policy constructs productiveness as crucial to the imagined national sameness, whereas Danish policy constructs cultural sameness as fundamental to the national self-image. By constructing the figure of "the unproductive"/"the non-Western" as the other, diverging from an imagined sameness, policies for organising the city through removing and "improving" urban diverse others are legitimised. Originality/value The authors add to previous research by focussing on the construction of the self as crucial in processes of othering and by highlighting how both nationalistic and colour-blind policy discourses construct myths of national sameness, which legitimise the governing of urban diversity. The authors highlight and de-naturalise assumptions and categorisations by showing how problem representations differ over time and between two neighbouring countries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2022. Vol. 11, no 1, p. 5-19
Keywords [en]
Segregation, Ghettoization, Migration, Othering, Urban diversity, Social imaginaries, Policy
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-46300DOI: 10.1108/JOE-06-2021-0034ISI: 000693451800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85114515954OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-46300DiVA, id: diva2:1602754
Available from: 2021-10-13 Created: 2021-10-13 Last updated: 2024-04-11Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Displacing Diversity: How Social Mix Interventions are Legitimised, Experienced and Resisted in a Danish Neighbourhood
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Displacing Diversity: How Social Mix Interventions are Legitimised, Experienced and Resisted in a Danish Neighbourhood
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This doctoral thesis explores residents’ experiences of and resistance to social mix interventions, as well as how these interventions are legitimised in policies. This is studied through an ethnographic approach to policies combined with ethnographic fieldwork in a neighbourhood targeted by social mix interventions. In its empirical scope, the thesis is limited to a Scandinavian context, highlighting the perspectives of residents in a Danish neighbourhood targeted by the so-called ghetto legislation and comparing Danish and Swedish policies. 

The first article of this compilation thesis explores problematisations of urban diversity in Danish and Swedish urban and integration policies. It highlights processes of ‘selfing/othering’, showing how Danish policies construct the figure of ’the non-Western’ and myths of national sameness based on assumptions about cultural homogeneity, while Swedish policies construct the figure of ‘the unproductive’ based on assumptions about sameness as productiveness. The second article explores residents’ experiences of ongoing interventions for social mix. The analysis shows how residents live in conditions of evictability and how they are subjected to the discursive, material, and psychological violence of un-homing, i.e., residents are deprived of their home on multiple scales, even before relocation. The third article highlights how residents engage in various forms of resistance against displacement and commodification. The analysis emphasises how residents’ resistance is both individual and collective, material and discursive, discreet and confrontational. In addition, it shows how residents’ resistance is productive and ambiguous, producing new discourses, (dis)alliances, and places.

Researching experiences of social mix interventions while they occur, this thesis adds new aspects to previous research, which is mainly concerned with whether social mix policies ‘work’. The analysis shows how social mix interventions have immediate, wide-reaching and unintended consequences, and highlights mundane and productive dimensions of processes of resistance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö University Press, 2024. p. 127
Series
Malmö Studies in International Migration and Ethnic Relations, ISSN 1652-3997, E-ISSN 2004-9285
Keywords
Ghetto policies, Racialisation, Commodification, Un-homing, Resistance
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-66707 (URN)10.24834/isbn.9789178774685 (DOI)978-91-7877-468-5 (ISBN)978-91-7877-467-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-06-05, NI:B0E15, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1, Malmö, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Paper III in dissertation as manuscript

Available from: 2024-04-18 Created: 2024-04-11 Last updated: 2024-06-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(170 kB)200 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 170 kBChecksum SHA-512
518bb649004c1a09e431c953ffbb36e0750604966d2e57f08e57da9dd29a464ec3fca801bd20cdedd11d37737f583434b586d809e74f94b12fe5f18f52838d0a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jensen, Tina GudrunSöderberg, Rebecka

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jensen, Tina GudrunSöderberg, Rebecka
By organisation
Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare (MIM)Department of Global Political Studies (GPS)
In the same journal
Journal of Organizational Ethnography
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 231 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 611 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf