Building interpretable machine learning agents is a challenge that needs to be addressed to make the agents trustworthy and align the usage of the technology with human values. In this work, we focus on how to evaluate interpretability in a machine teaching setting, a settingthat involves a human domain expert as a teacher in relation to a machine learning agent. By using a prototype in a study, we discuss theinterpretability denition and show how interpretability can be evaluatedon a functional-, human- and application level. We end the paperby discussing open questions and suggestions on how our results can be transferable to other domains.

Machine learning research today is dominated by atechnocentric perspective and in many cases disconnected fromthe users of the technology. The machine teaching paradigm insteadshifts the focus from machine learning experts towards thedomain experts and users of machine learning technology. Thisshift opens up for new perspectives on the current use of machinelearning as well as new usage areas to explore. In this study,we apply and map existing machine teaching principles ontoa contextual machine teaching implementation in a commutingsetting. The aim is to highlight areas in machine teaching theorythat requires more attention. The main contribution of this workis an increased focus on available features, the features space andthe potential to transfer some of the domain expert’s explanatorypowers to the machine learning system.

In this paper, we study explanations in a setting where human capabilities are in parity with Machine Learning (ML) capabilities. If an ML system is to be trusted in this situation, limitations in the trained ML model’s abilities have to be exposed to the end-user. A majority of current approaches focus on the task of creating explanations for a proposed decision, but less attention is given to the equally important task of exposing limitations in the ML model’s capabilities, limitations that in turn affect the validity of created explanations. Using a small-scale design experiment we compare human explanations with explanations created by an ML system. This paper explores and presents how the structure and terminology of scientific explanations can expose limitations in the ML models knowledge and be used as an approach for research and design in the area of explainable artificial intelligence.