Malmö University Publications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0749-5718
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4632-6175
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8884-1490
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0077-9061
2021 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 11, no 2, article id e045345Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives Formative peer assessment focuses onlearning and development of the student learning process.This implies that students are taking responsibility forassessing the work of their peers by giving and receivingfeedback to each other. The aim was to compile researchabout formative peer assessment presented in higherhealthcare education, focusing on the rationale, theinterventions, the experiences of students and teachersand the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.Design A scoping review.Data sources Searches were conducted until May 2019in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied HealthLiterature, Education Research Complete and EducationResearch Centre. Grey literature was searched in LibrarySearch, Google Scholar and Science Direct.Eligibility criteria Studies addressing formative peerassessment in higher education, focusing on medicine,nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupationaltherapy and radiology published in peer-reviewedarticlesor in grey literature.Data extractions and synthesis Out of 1452 studies,37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraisedusing relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, JoannaBriggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools.The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis.Result The critical appraisal resulted in 18 includedstudies with high and moderate quality. The rationale forusing formative peer assessment relates to giving andreceiving constructive feedback as a means to promotelearning. The experience and outcome of formativepeer assessment interventions from the perspectiveof students and teachers are presented within threethemes: (1) organisation and structure of the formativepeer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes andconsequences for oneself and relationships and (3)experience and outcome of feedback and learning.Conclusion Healthcare education must considerpreparing and introducing students to collaborativelearning, and thus develop well-designedlearningactivities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peercollaboration seems to affect students’ and teachers’experiences of formative peer assessment, empiricalinvestigations exploring collaboration between studentsare of utmost importance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2021. Vol. 11, no 2, article id e045345
Keywords [en]
formative assessment, peer, higher health care education
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Health Sciences
Research subject
Care science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-41106DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345ISI: 000618268000009PubMedID: 33563627Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100953831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-41106DiVA, id: diva2:1535471
Available from: 2021-03-09 Created: 2021-03-09 Last updated: 2026-01-27Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Collaboration in clinical skills lab: perspectives from students and educators in nurse education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Collaboration in clinical skills lab: perspectives from students and educators in nurse education
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to explore the collaboration and the collaborative process between bachelor nursing students during clinical skills lab practices from the perspective of nursing students and nurse educators and the use of formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programs.

In the first study, an exploration of formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programs was carried out by mapping the existing research literature in the field. After critical appraisal of the literature, a thematic analysis was performed. The results revealed a process consisting of two consecutive phases. The first phase involved the rationale for formative peer assessment, which was to support student learning as preparation for the healthcare professions. The second phase concerned the organization and the structure of the formative peer assessment activity and how the complexity of collaboration between the students affected their relationships with each other. The revealed complexity of peer collaboration influenced the aim of the subsequent empirical qualitative studies because similar results have been described in previous studies in connection with collaborative learning activities.

The second and third studies explored how first-year bachelor nursing students collaborate as well as the collaborative process during practice in clinical skills labs. Fieldwork with participant observations and focus group interviews was performed. Thematic network analysis was carried out in the second study, and a narrative analysis of fieldnotes and transcribed focus groups interviews was conducted in the third study to analyse the collaborative process. In the fourth study, interviews were performed with nurse educators with teaching experiences from clinical skills labs. The aim was to understand their different conceptions of nursing students’ collaboration. The transcribed interviews were analysed with a phenomenographic approach.

The findings from the second study showed that collaboration between nursing students is a field of tension between adaptation and non-conformity. Adaptation represents the students’ ability to adapt to new knowledge, to each other, and to being a nursing student. The non-conformity in the collaboration corresponds to students’ difficulties in accepting the perspective of others, finding mutual goals, sharing decisions, and providing supportive and constructive feedback to each other.

In the third study a sequential process was identified in the exploration of the collaborative process between the nursing students. The initial period was characterized by navigating in unfamiliar territory, which included anxieties related to not being involved, not being familiar with the context, and not being sure of the expectations. Over time, the students started to navigate together to cope in response to the complexities of the tasks they had ahead of them. To overcome these complexities, they looked for people like themselves, which led to homogenous groups. At the end of their training period the students were approaching independence in anticipation of their future nursing profession. In this period the role of the educator became less prominent, and the students mostly relied on each other’s knowledge. The feedback they provided to each other became constructive with suggestions for improvement. The focus was now on the task at hand, and with whom it was practiced was of less importance.

In the final study, the nurse educators’ various conceptions of nursing students’ collaboration described an outcome space that indicated that the purpose of collaboration was the most complex descriptive category that formed the didactive activities related to collaboration, the nursing students’ interpersonal skills, and the group activity skills.

Conclusively, and reflected in Vygotsky’s theory of Zone of Proximal Development, the collaboration between the nursing students during skills lab practices shows that the students’ collaboration can develop from a zone of current development to a collective zone of proximal development with support from their peers. For education to support the students’ transition to independence, the educational purpose of collaboration needs to be defined by the faculty. The collaboration needs to be guided by scaffolding activities contextualized to the nursing profession and adjusted to where the students are in the collaborative process. Instructional directives for peer observations and feedback along with didactive activities might decrease anxiety and complexity in collaborative learning and thereby prepare students for the crucial collaboration that takes place in the nursing profession.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö University Press, 2025. p. 78
Series
Malmö University Health and Society Dissertations, ISSN 1653-5383, E-ISSN 2004-9277 ; 2025:5
Keywords
clinical skills lab, collaboration, collaborative learning, nurse educators, nursing students, the Zone of proximal development
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-74750 (URN)10.24834/isbn.9789178776191 (DOI)978-91-7877-618-4 (ISBN)978-91-7877-619-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-04-11, Allmänna sjukhuset, HS aula, Jan Waldenströms gata 25, Malmö, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Paper 4 in disseration as manuscript.

Available from: 2025-03-20 Created: 2025-03-17 Last updated: 2026-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(705 kB)511 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 705 kBChecksum SHA-512
d2a398b71de1f2fa5093ecaf88d04a7be9d2827f3d733d541452f9490dddf0d904ee716a431da548ee0ddd3490956a8b5a4dacd03bac2e55f610b790c597a736
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Stenberg, MarieMangrio, ElisabethBengtsson, MarietteCarlson, Elisabeth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenberg, MarieMangrio, ElisabethBengtsson, MarietteCarlson, Elisabeth
By organisation
Department of Care Science (VV)
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Medical and Health SciencesHealth Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 512 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 494 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf