Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Affective Language in Student Peer Reviews: Exploring Data from Three Institutional Contexts
Malmö University, Faculty of Education and Society (LS), Department of Culture, Languages and Media (KSM).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3352-4102
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Academic Writing, E-ISSN 2225-8973, Vol. 8, no 1, p. 28-53Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although peer review is a common practice in writing classrooms, there are still few studies that analyze written patterns in students’ peer reviews across multiple institutional contexts. Based on a sample of approximately 50,000 peer reviews written by students at the University of South Florida (USF), Malmö University (MAU), and the University of Tartu (UT), this study examines how students formulate criticism and praise, negotiate power relations, and express authority and expertise in reviewing their peers’ writing. The study specifically focuses on features of affective language, including adjectives, expressions of suggestion, boosters and hedges, cognitive verbs, personal pronouns, and adversative transitions. The results show that across all three contexts, the peer reviews contain a blend of foci, including descriptions and evaluations of peer texts, directives or suggestions for revisions, responses to the writer or the text, and indications of reader interpretations. Across all three contexts, peer reviews also contain more positively glossed responses than negatively glossed responses. By contrast, certain features of affective language pattern idiosyncratically in different contexts; these distinctions can be explained variously according to writer experience, nativeness, and institutional context. The findings carry implications for continued research and for instructional guidance for student peer review.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing , 2018. Vol. 8, no 1, p. 28-53
Keywords [en]
peer-review, big data, intercultural rhetoric, corpus research, affective language
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-14456DOI: 10.18552/joaw.v8i1.429Local ID: 26718OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-14456DiVA, id: diva2:1417977
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(604 kB)89 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 604 kBChecksum SHA-512
1a24ca83a4b93fd2d34e11b39024898278bcb844e2ee723930f0a051e797723bffa64419acb7b57fb2b700d1161bee7c2c6a1af91505b8ead66fb17a6598d7fc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Wärnsby, AnnaKauppinen, Asko

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wärnsby, AnnaKauppinen, Asko
By organisation
Department of Culture, Languages and Media (KSM)
In the same journal
Journal of Academic Writing
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 89 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 156 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf