Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing Exposure to Cyberbullying Behaviour in Working Life
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US). Malmö högskola, Centre for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5972-4933
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US). Malmö högskola, Centre for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2207-0996
Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, Lund, Sweden.
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US). Malmö högskola, Centre for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA).
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Psychology, ISSN 0020-7594, E-ISSN 1464-066X, Vol. 51, no Issue S1, p. 22-22Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to analyse the reliability and validity of a cyberbullying behaviour questionnaire (CBQ) in working life. Further aim was to analyse the reliability and validity of a short version of a cyberbullying behaviour questionnaire (CBQ‐S) in working life. Altogether 3 371 working adults in Sweden, and 238 in the USA participated in the study. The results of the confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) showed that the one‐factor CFA model had an excellent fit to data, and Cronbach's alpha indicates that both scales are reliable. In addition, the convergent validity of the scales was demonstrated by significant correlations with the following theoretically relevant concepts: wellbeing, work engagement and intention to quit. The results of the study support the use of the CBQ and CBQ‐S as reliable and valid measures of cyberbullying behaviour in working life.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2016. Vol. 51, no Issue S1, p. 22-22
Keywords [en]
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-14400ISI: 000413720400089Local ID: 27350OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-14400DiVA, id: diva2:1417920
Conference
31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan (24–29 July 2016)
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.12294

Authority records

Muhonen, TuijaJönsson, SandraForssell, Rebecka

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Muhonen, TuijaJönsson, SandraForssell, Rebecka
By organisation
Department of Urban Studies (US)Centre for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA)
In the same journal
International Journal of Psychology
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 173 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf