Publikationer från Malmö universitet
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pain intensity and discomfort following surgical placement of orthodontic anchoring units and premolar extraction: a randomized controlled trial
Malmö högskola, Odontologiska fakulteten (OD).ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9638-4648
Malmö högskola, Odontologiska fakulteten (OD).
2007 (Engelska)Ingår i: Angle orthodontist, ISSN 0003-3219, E-ISSN 1945-7103, Vol. 77, nr 4, s. 578-585Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare perceived pain intensity and discomfort between the placement of two different orthodontic anchoring units designed for osseointegration and premolar extraction in adolescent patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 adolescent patients (60 girls and 60 boys) were recruited and randomized into three groups. Group A underwent installation of an onplant, group B installation of an Orthosystem implant, and group C premolar extraction. Pain intensity and discomfort, analgesic consumption, limitations in daily activities, and functional jaw impairment were evaluated the first evening and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: Pain intensity following surgical installation of an onplant was comparable to the pain intensity experienced after premolar extraction, but there was significantly less pain after surgical installation of an Orthosystem implant compared to installation of an onplant (P = .002) or premolar extraction (P = .007). The protective, vacuum-formed stent caused great discomfort, even more discomfort than the surgical sites following installation of the onplant or the Orthosystem implant. CONCLUSION: The Orthosystem implant was better tolerated than the onplant in terms of pain intensity, discomfort, and analgesic consumption and was, therefore, the anchorage system of choice in a short-term perspective.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2007. Vol. 77, nr 4, s. 578-585
Nationell ämneskategori
Odontologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15695DOI: 10.2319/062506-257.1ISI: 000248074900002PubMedID: 17605489Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-34447125289Lokalt ID: 4697OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15695DiVA, id: diva2:1419217
Tillgänglig från: 2020-03-30 Skapad: 2020-03-30 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-02-05Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Orthodontic anchorage: evidence-based evaluation of anchorage capacity and patients' perceptions
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Orthodontic anchorage: evidence-based evaluation of anchorage capacity and patients' perceptions
2007 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Orthodontic anchorage is the ability to resist unwanted reciprocalforces and reinforcement of anchorage by supplementary appliances,in or outside the mouth, is often needed to obtain successful results.In the last 10 years, interest in appliances that use implants has beengrowing.Successful orthodontic treatment demands effective methods andsystematic evaluation of different treatment approaches is thereforeessential. Several studies on the efficiency of various anchorage systemshave been published, but a critical appraisal or interpretationof evidence that systematically considers validity, results, and relevancehas not been made. Analysis of treatment modalities must alsoinclude patients’ perceptions and potential side-effects.The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate a new anchoragetechnique that incorporates osseointegration and compare it withconventional methods concerning effects on tooth movements inadolescents and their acceptance and experience of the additionalsurgical procedures that osseointegration involves. The followinganchorage systems were analyzed: Onplant system, Orthosystemimplant, headgear and transpalatal bar.This thesis was based on four studies:Paper I systematically reviewed the efficiency of orthodontic anchoragesystems and interpreted the methodological quality of theselected studies from an evidence-based perspective. The literaturesearch spanned January 1966 – December 2004 and was later extendedto July 2007.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology, Department of Orthodontics, 2007. s. 132
Serie
Swedish Dental Journal : Supplement, ISSN 0348-6672 ; 191
Nationell ämneskategori
Odontologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-7713 (URN)18210769 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-38749127598 (Scopus ID)4751 (Lokalt ID)91-7104-294-6 (ISBN)4751 (Arkivnummer)4751 (OAI)
Tillgänglig från: 2020-02-28 Skapad: 2020-02-28 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-12-02Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

List, ThomasBondemark, Lars

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
List, ThomasBondemark, Lars
Av organisationen
Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
I samma tidskrift
Angle orthodontist
Odontologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 79 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf