Publikationer från Malmö universitet
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pain intensity and discomfort following surgical placement of orthodontic anchoring units and premolar extraction: a randomized controlled trial
Malmö högskola, Odontologiska fakulteten (OD).ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9638-4648
Malmö högskola, Odontologiska fakulteten (OD).
2007 (engelsk)Inngår i: Angle orthodontist, ISSN 0003-3219, E-ISSN 1945-7103, Vol. 77, nr 4, s. 578-585Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare perceived pain intensity and discomfort between the placement of two different orthodontic anchoring units designed for osseointegration and premolar extraction in adolescent patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 adolescent patients (60 girls and 60 boys) were recruited and randomized into three groups. Group A underwent installation of an onplant, group B installation of an Orthosystem implant, and group C premolar extraction. Pain intensity and discomfort, analgesic consumption, limitations in daily activities, and functional jaw impairment were evaluated the first evening and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: Pain intensity following surgical installation of an onplant was comparable to the pain intensity experienced after premolar extraction, but there was significantly less pain after surgical installation of an Orthosystem implant compared to installation of an onplant (P = .002) or premolar extraction (P = .007). The protective, vacuum-formed stent caused great discomfort, even more discomfort than the surgical sites following installation of the onplant or the Orthosystem implant. CONCLUSION: The Orthosystem implant was better tolerated than the onplant in terms of pain intensity, discomfort, and analgesic consumption and was, therefore, the anchorage system of choice in a short-term perspective.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2007. Vol. 77, nr 4, s. 578-585
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15695DOI: 10.2319/062506-257.1ISI: 000248074900002PubMedID: 17605489Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-34447125289Lokal ID: 4697OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15695DiVA, id: diva2:1419217
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-03-30 Laget: 2020-03-30 Sist oppdatert: 2024-02-05bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Orthodontic anchorage: evidence-based evaluation of anchorage capacity and patients' perceptions
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Orthodontic anchorage: evidence-based evaluation of anchorage capacity and patients' perceptions
2007 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Orthodontic anchorage is the ability to resist unwanted reciprocalforces and reinforcement of anchorage by supplementary appliances,in or outside the mouth, is often needed to obtain successful results.In the last 10 years, interest in appliances that use implants has beengrowing.Successful orthodontic treatment demands effective methods andsystematic evaluation of different treatment approaches is thereforeessential. Several studies on the efficiency of various anchorage systemshave been published, but a critical appraisal or interpretationof evidence that systematically considers validity, results, and relevancehas not been made. Analysis of treatment modalities must alsoinclude patients’ perceptions and potential side-effects.The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate a new anchoragetechnique that incorporates osseointegration and compare it withconventional methods concerning effects on tooth movements inadolescents and their acceptance and experience of the additionalsurgical procedures that osseointegration involves. The followinganchorage systems were analyzed: Onplant system, Orthosystemimplant, headgear and transpalatal bar.This thesis was based on four studies:Paper I systematically reviewed the efficiency of orthodontic anchoragesystems and interpreted the methodological quality of theselected studies from an evidence-based perspective. The literaturesearch spanned January 1966 – December 2004 and was later extendedto July 2007.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology, Department of Orthodontics, 2007. s. 132
Serie
Swedish Dental Journal : Supplement, ISSN 0348-6672 ; 191
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-7713 (URN)18210769 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-38749127598 (Scopus ID)4751 (Lokal ID)91-7104-294-6 (ISBN)4751 (Arkivnummer)4751 (OAI)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-02-28 Laget: 2020-02-28 Sist oppdatert: 2024-12-02bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

List, ThomasBondemark, Lars

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
List, ThomasBondemark, Lars
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Angle orthodontist

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 79 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf