Malmö University Publications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical Outcomes of Maxillary Sinus Floor Perforation by Dental Implants and Sinus Membrane Perforation during Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
2024 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Medicine, E-ISSN 2077-0383, Vol. 13, no 5, article id 1253Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the clinical outcomes after the perforation of the maxillary sinus by dental implants, or after maxillary sinus membrane perforation during sinus lift procedure. Twenty-nine publications were included. Failure rates of implants in cases where perforation of sinus floor had happened (11 studies) was generally low, and only one case of transient sinusitis was reported. The estimated failure rate of these implants was 2.1% (SE 1.0%, p = 0.035). There were 1817 implants (73 failures) placed in augmented sinuses in which the sinus membrane was perforated and 5043 implants (274 failures) placed in sinuses with no perforated membrane, from 18 studies. The odds of implant failure difference between the groups were not significant (OR 1.347, p = 0.197). log OR of implant failure between perforated and non-perforated membrane groups did not significantly change with the follow-up time (-0.004/month; p = 0.500). In conclusion, implant failure rate is generally low either for implants penetrating in the floor of the maxillary sinus or implants placed in augmented sinuses in which the sinus membrane was perforated. The prevalence of postoperative infection/sinusitis is low, and it may depend either on the dimensions of the perforation or on the anatomical predisposition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2024. Vol. 13, no 5, article id 1253
Keywords [en]
dental implant, maxillary sinus, sinus membrane, perforation, failure, systematic review, meta-analysis
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-66912DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051253ISI: 001182667900001PubMedID: 38592698Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85187413552OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-66912DiVA, id: diva2:1854492
Available from: 2024-04-25 Created: 2024-04-25 Last updated: 2024-04-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1482 kB)138 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1482 kBChecksum SHA-512
82d9812b56e7f780474b58f92fec4f23e83d25e5cdcdc9abe313ea26b562e4acd548a50e1099576947ece07e3ead69ebfbeefe69e122382cded96517ea078bb2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sala, Yousef MohamedLu, HansChrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 138 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 270 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf