Malmö University Publications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Wærp, Eline
Publications (7 of 7) Show all publications
Wærp, E. (2024). Frontex’s Normalization of Crisis at the EU Borders. Neuchatel
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Frontex’s Normalization of Crisis at the EU Borders
2024 (English)Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

In 2015, more than a million refugees and migrants came to Europe during the so-called ‘migration crisis.’ This prompted a host of security-oriented responses to protect the EU’s external borders, spearheaded by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex). While the number of irregular border crossings has decreased substantially since, Frontex continues to portray an image of crisis at the borders, which serves to “normalize” crisis and justify increased border controls in its response.

Place, publisher, year, pages
Neuchatel: , 2024. p. 5
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Research subject
Global politics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-65356 (URN)
Available from: 2024-01-24 Created: 2024-01-24 Last updated: 2024-01-24Bibliographically approved
Wærp, E. (2024). How Frontex Frames Non-Rescue as Humanitarian. Bolzano
Open this publication in new window or tab >>How Frontex Frames Non-Rescue as Humanitarian
2024 (English)Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

Civil society actors have long criticized the EU for the lack of search and rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean Sea. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimates that between 2014-2024, a minimum of 28,000 refugees and migrants have lost their lives or gone missing in the Mediterranean, with the Central Mediterranean being the deadliest migration route in the world. The European Border and Coast Guard agency (Frontex), however, believes that SAR constitutes a so-called ‘pull-factor’ which entices more people to attempt the dangerous crossing and die at sea, portraying non-rescue as in their best interest.

Place, publisher, year, pages
Bolzano: , 2024. p. 3
Series
Science blogs: Mobile people and diverse societies
Keywords
Frontex, SAR, non-rescue, humanitarian
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Research subject
Global politics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-65984 (URN)10.57708/BQJGNBIBDRQUQCI2WYQBJAA (DOI)
Available from: 2024-02-14 Created: 2024-02-14 Last updated: 2024-02-15Bibliographically approved
Wærp, E. (2022). ‘Shifting Borders’ and Shifting Responsibility? Towards a More Just Model of Global Mobility. Malmö: Malmö universitet
Open this publication in new window or tab >>‘Shifting Borders’ and Shifting Responsibility? Towards a More Just Model of Global Mobility
2022 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This working paper critically examines Ayelet Shachar’s (2020) concept of the ‘shifting border’ and the solutions she proposes to tackle this recent phenomenon, pointing out potential gaps, inconsistencies and unintended consequences of letting legal responsibility follow states’ ‘shifting borders’. Instead, the paper argues for the need to deterritorialize the right to asylumin order to prevent states from retracting back from or shifting out their responsibilities for refugees and migrants, and to question and ultimately relax our current state-imposed mobility controls which have come to be largely taken for granted, even among migration and border scholars.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö universitet, 2022. p. 18
Series
MIM Working Paper Series ; 22:4
Keywords
Shifting borders, Shachar, EUropean border management, de-territorialization of asylum.
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Research subject
Global politics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-51790 (URN)10.24834/isbn.9789178772902 (DOI)9789178772902 (ISBN)
Available from: 2022-05-31 Created: 2022-05-31 Last updated: 2022-06-03Bibliographically approved
Wærp, E. (2021). Frontex: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Frontex: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?
2021 (English)Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Publisher
p. 1
Series
Summer school 'Borders and Migration in Digital Times'
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Research subject
Global politics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-46102 (URN)
Available from: 2021-09-26 Created: 2021-09-26 Last updated: 2022-08-17Bibliographically approved
Wærp, E. (2021). The Bordering and De-Bordering of Asylum.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Bordering and De-Bordering of Asylum
2021 (English)Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Publisher
p. 1
Series
Summer school 'Borders and Migration in Digital Times'
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-46103 (URN)
Available from: 2021-09-26 Created: 2021-09-26 Last updated: 2021-10-28Bibliographically approved
Wærp, E. (2020). Book review: At Europe’s Edge: Migration and Crisis in the Mediterranean, Mainwaring (2019) [Review]. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(3), 564-567
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Book review: At Europe’s Edge: Migration and Crisis in the Mediterranean, Mainwaring (2019)
2020 (English)In: International Journal of Refugee Law, ISSN 0953-8186, E-ISSN 1464-3715, Vol. 32, no 3, p. 564-567Article, book review (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Review of Ċetta Mainwaring, At Europe’s Edge: Migration and Crisis in the Mediterranean (Oxford University Press, New York 2019)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2020
National Category
International Migration and Ethnic Relations
Research subject
Global politics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-40848 (URN)10.1093/ijrl/eeaa031 (DOI)000634882300012 ()
Available from: 2021-02-23 Created: 2021-02-23 Last updated: 2022-08-19Bibliographically approved
Wærp, E. (2019). Humanitarian Borderwork?: An Analysis of Frontex’s Discourses and Practices (ed.). : Malmö University, Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare (MIM)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Humanitarian Borderwork?: An Analysis of Frontex’s Discourses and Practices
2019 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The concept of ’humanitarian borderwork’ (Pallister-Wilkins 2017) entered the social sciences the last couple of years, in the wake of the 2015 migration crisis to the EU. With roots in the ’humanitarian border enforcement’ discourse (Williams 2016) that developed in the US post-9/11, the concept suggests that the goals of ‘migrant safety’ (i.e. human security) and ‘border control’ (i.e. state security) are mutually attainable. This ‘humanitarian-security’ (Andersson 2017, De Lauri 2018) or ‘safety/security’ (Williams 2016) nexus casts increased border control as not the cause of, but the remedy to, migrants’ vulnerability and death. ‘Humanitarian borderwork’ further implies a convergence between two seemingly distinct concepts: ‘humanitarianism’ and ‘borderwork’ (Walters 2011). Whereas ‘humanitarianism’ has traditionally been associated with a concern for humanity, human rights, alleviation of suffering, and the principle of ‘do no harm’; ‘borderwork’ has been preoccupied with exclusion, control, security and monitoring/surveillance (Pallister-Wilkins 2015b). And whereas humanitarian action has traditionally been carried out by depoliticized, independent actors (notably NGOs) with the sole purpose of providing humanitarian assistance (Redfield and Bornstein 2011); humanitarianism is now increasingly being delivered by (supranational) state-actors, such as the EU’s Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – which claims to be just as preoccupied with saving lives as protecting the EU’s external borders. This begs the questions: are ‘humanitarianism’ and ‘borderwork’ compatible concepts? And if so, in the case of the EU, how humanitarian is Frontex’s borderwork? Informed by a literature review of the genealogy of the concepts of ‘humanitarianism’ and ‘humanitarian borderwork’, the paper problematizes the latter and seeks to answer those questions by analyzing and comparing Frontex’s humanitarian discourses and practices to the understanding of humanitarianism within anthropology – a field that has studied it extensively. The paper thus provides part of the literature review and theoretical- and conceptual framework for the dissertation, to be complemented with more empirics at a later stage. Arguing that while Frontex’s ‘humanitarian borderwork’ fails to meet the criteria in the traditional understanding of humanitarianism, it does succeed in situating itself within the ‘new humanitarianism’ (Nascimento 2015) that emerged after the end of the Cold War – where state actors play a larger role, and militarization and securitization of borders increasingly shape humanitarian action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö University, Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare (MIM), 2019
Series
MIM Working Paper Series ; 19:3
Keywords
Humanitarian borderwork, Frontex, Discourses and practices, New humanitarianism
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-12974 (URN)10.24834/9789178770540 (DOI)30744 (Local ID)978-91-7877-054-0 (ISBN)30744 (Archive number)30744 (OAI)
Available from: 2020-02-29 Created: 2020-02-29 Last updated: 2020-06-02Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications