This thesis primary aim is to examine specific deterrence; the fear of punishment
experienced by individuals who have committed crimes and subsequently
received a punishment. Specific deterrence is assumed to deter criminals from
reoffending. The secondary aim of this thesis is to examine the perceptions of
increased punishments as a measure to prevent crime, as deterrence theory
predicts that increased punishment correlates to decreased criminality. The
Swedish government has continually proposed and implemented increased
punishments. As such, the validity of specific deterrence and the effectiveness of
increased punishments requires examination in a Swedish context. Perceptions
and experiences of specific deterrence, and perceptions of the deterring effect of
increased punishments, was examined in 12 semi-structured interviews with
people who have committed a crime and received subsequent punishment. The
material was analysed using thematic analysis, and the results found that the
participants did not experience deterrence, as drug addiction, fear of consequences
from other criminals, and perceptions of apprehension and severity of punishment
inhibited, or eliminated, specific deterrence. Increased punishments were not
thought to have affected past criminal actions, but opinions on increased
punishments to combat current criminality were both positive and negative. By
applying General Strain theory, the study found that the presence of a stronger
experience of strain eliminated or diminished specific deterrence.