Malmö University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 3 of 3
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Hansson, Lisa
    et al.
    Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College – Specialized University in Logistics, Molde, Norway.
    Aldenius, Malin
    Division of Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University, Sweden.
    Paulsson, Alexander
    Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Sweden.
    Thoresson, Karin
    The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden.
    Vitestam, Birgitta
    Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US).
    Innovation in stable competitive tendering regimes: An insoluble knot?2023In: Research in Transportation Economics, ISSN 0739-8859, E-ISSN 1875-7979, Vol. 100, article id 101332Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The transport sector is currently undergoing rapid development, which is to a large extent driven by innovation and technological changes initiated by various market actors. At the same time, public transport operations are largely framed by extensive procurement processes and a mature market where a few large companies compete for market share. In Europe, there is tension between rapid innovative development in the sector, on one hand, and stability given by regulation practices shaping procurement processes, on the other. This paper presents results from a study in which opportunities for innovation in procurement processes were examined. The findings are based on public transport authorities' and transport companies’ experiences from tendering bus transport in the three largest cities in Sweden. By using a theoretical perspective of innovation and institutional logics, the paper explains the restrictive role innovation has in procurement processes and discusses the conflicting views transport authorities and transport companies put forward. The paper is of general value since it raises questions related to the complexity of existing tendering regimes and the possibilities of facilitating innovation.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 2.
    Paulsson, Alexander
    et al.
    VTI (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute), MAP Unit, Sweden.
    Isaksson, Karolina
    VTI (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute), MAP Unit, Sweden.
    Sørensen, Claus Hedegaard
    VTI (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute), MAP Unit, Sweden.
    Hrelja, Robert
    VTI (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute), MAP Unit, Sweden.
    Rye, Tom
    Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom.
    Scholten, Christina
    Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US).
    Collaboration in public transport planning - Why, how and what?2018In: Research in Transportation Economics, ISSN 0739-8859, E-ISSN 1875-7979, Vol. 69, p. 377-385Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper is about collaboration in public transport governance. Drawing upon the emerging literature that views collaboration through the lens of networks, we explore why and how regional public transport authorities collaborate with both municipalities and public transport operators in the planning of public transport. We also explore the advantages and disadvantages of such collaborations. Based on interviews with civil servants (government officers) in the Swedish metropolitan regions of Stockholm, Vastra Gotaland and Scania, we conclude that collaboration is, firstly, a way for the regional public transport authorities (RPTA) to engage with the local municipalities and develop joint agreements on public transport priorities. It is also a way to build a common identity with the public transport operators, who operate services under tendered contracts. Secondly, we find that collaboration takes place during official meetings, as well as in informal conversations and face-to-face dialogues. Thirdly, the potential advantages and disadvantages of collaboration hinge on the ability of coordinating actors to put in place processes where the feasibility of plans can be established, and where a sense of common identity can be constructed.

  • 3.
    Pettersson, Fredrik
    et al.
    Department of Technology and Society, Transport & Roads, HS3, Lund University, Lund, 221 00, Sweden; K2 – the Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport, Lund, Sweden.
    Westerdahl, Stig
    Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US). K2 – The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport.
    Hansson, Joel
    Department of Technology and Society, Transport & Roads, HS3, Lund University, Lund, 221 00, Sweden; K2 – the Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport, Lund, Sweden.
    Learning through collaboration in the Swedish public transport sector? Co-production through guidelines and living labs2018In: Research in Transportation Economics, ISSN 0739-8859, E-ISSN 1875-7979, Vol. 69, p. 394-401Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of the paper is to analyse informal collaboration in the public transport sector. Two Swedish case studies, Living lab Uddevalla and Guidelines for Regional BRT are analysed and compared concerning what kind of learning occurred and what lessons regarding informal collaboration to draw from the two cases. For both cases the analysis indicates that individual, single loop learning is the most striking type of learning among the participants. The voluntary approach of the two cases has advantages and drawbacks. Advantages include that participants were truly interested in the issues of collaboration, which created energy and contributed to building trust. The main drawback identified was that in both cases the voluntary enthusiasm of the participants collided with the formal requirements of planning and decision making. This has stifled the possibility of the informal collaboration processes to induce change in prevailing practices.

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
1 - 3 of 3
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf