Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The transformative power of practitioner inquiry: collaborative autoethnography, norm critique and research circles in Swedish education
Malmö University, Faculty of Education and Society (LS), Department of School Development and Leadership (SOL).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1555-6493
2024 (English)In: Critical Studies in Education, ISSN 1750-8487, E-ISSN 1750-8495, p. 1-18Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This article builds on the social justice and critical and emancipatorydimensions of practitioner inquiry in education. The aim is todemonstrate the potential and challenges of collaborative autoeth-nography for institutional change, transformative learning andnorm critique. Taking Jack Mezirow’s and Paulo Freire’s theoreticalframework as a starting point, I analyse four autoethnographiccases conducted by Swedish teachers. I demonstrate the ways inwhich autoethnography may help teachers realise their own silenceand unresponsiveness regarding oppression related to ethnicity,gender, professional role and generational hierarchies in preschoolsand schools. The collaborative autoethnography also instigatesteachers’ realisation of space-time dynamics and other institutiona-lised constraints and their constitutive power over practices, feel-ings, understandings and social relations. The transformativelearning that has emerged from collaborative autoethnographyhas led us to recognise the necessity and challenges of conductingempirical analysis, engaging in self-reflection and dialogue, andtransforming institutionalised and personal practices and norms.While bringing about institutional change has been challenging,individual and relational transformation has been more achievable.I argue that top-down initiated practitioner inquiry with colleaguesand superiors at one’s workplace may be more challenging, andI also argue for the benefits of engaging in practitioner inquiry withpeople outside one’s own organisation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2024. p. 1-18
Keywords [en]
Transformative, learningpractitioner, inquiryresearch, circlenorm, critiqueautoethnography
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-71019DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2024.2400691ISI: 001309942500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85203552280OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-71019DiVA, id: diva2:1897259
Available from: 2024-09-12 Created: 2024-09-12 Last updated: 2024-10-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lozic, Vanja

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lozic, Vanja
By organisation
Department of School Development and Leadership (SOL)
In the same journal
Critical Studies in Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf