Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone compared with composite grafts: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Research Data and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Section for Oral Radiology, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN 0901-5027, E-ISSN 1399-0020, Vol. 53, no 11, p. 968-980, article id S0901-5027(24)00219-4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study evaluated radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with (A) autogenous bone, (B) 1:1 autogenous bone and deproteinized porcine bone mineral, or (C) 1:1 autogenous bone and biphasic bone graft material. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to groups A, B, and C (20 in each). CBCT scans were obtained at enrolment, after surgery (T1), after prosthetic rehabilitation (T2), and 1 year after implant loading (T3). Significant decreases in graft volume (3D) and graft height (2D) from T1 to T3 were observed in all groups (P < 0.05). However, at T2 and T3, graft volume was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C (P < 0.05), and graft height was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). Bone density increased significantly from T1 to T2 in all groups (P < 0.001). However, bone density was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C, at T2 and T3 (P < 0.05). No significant correlation between graft volume or height and implant protrusion length or residual bone height was found. In conclusion, 1:1 autogenous bone and porcine bone resulted in significantly higher graft volume, height, and bone density when compared with autogenous bone or a 1:1 ratio of autogenous bone and biphasic bone. However the higher graft volume, height, and bone density did not appear to lead to improved outcomes at 1 year of functional loading when compared to the other groups.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 53, no 11, p. 968-980, article id S0901-5027(24)00219-4
Keywords [en]
Alveolar ridge augmentation, Cone-beam computed tomography, Dental implants, Maxilla, Radiography, Randomized controlled trial, Sinus floor augmentation
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-70074DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.07.010ISI: 001337589300001PubMedID: 39054192Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199476118OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-70074DiVA, id: diva2:1886599
Available from: 2024-08-02 Created: 2024-08-02 Last updated: 2024-11-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ahmad, MarianneHellén-Halme, KristinaBecktor, Jonas P

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ahmad, MarianneHellén-Halme, KristinaBecktor, Jonas P
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf