This thesis explores the portrayal of Guantánamo Bay by The New York Times in 2023, focusing on its implications for human rights discourse. Utilizing Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework, the study examines how language and textual elements in the newspaper’s articles construct the narrative around the detention center. The analysis reveals that The New York Times emphasizes human rights abuses and legal failures at Guantánamo Bay, contrasting previous research that often framed these issues within the context of national security. The findings suggest that the newspaper's liberal stance influences its critical perspective, highlighting ethical and legal concerns over detainee treatment. The study concludes that while The New York Times' critical stance reflects its ideological leanings, it significantly contributes to shaping public discourse on human rights. Limitations include the exclusive focus on one media outlet and a single dimension of Fairclough’s framework, suggesting areas for future research.