Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The importance of discretion for welfare services to minorities: Examining workload and anti‐immigration attitudes
Department of International Economics, Government, and Business, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5878-9396
School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
2020 (English)In: Australian journal of public administration, ISSN 0313-6647, E-ISSN 1467-8500, Vol. 79, no 4, p. 426-443Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Migration influx in Western countries resulting in increas-ingly diverse societies results in more complex situationsfor bureaucrats in their client interactions in welfareorganizations. The role of discretion for services to clientshas received much attention in the public administrationresearch and therefore this study explores the relationamong perceived workload, anti-immigration attitudes,perceived discretion, and perceived difficulty in workingwith migrants. The paper examines the function of per-ceived discretion as moderator or mediator variable inthis constellation. The relations are examined by usingstructural equation modelling based on a survey amongSwedish welfare bureaucrats (N = 1,319). The results showthat heavier perceived workload increased the likelihoodof experiencing work with migrants as difficult and thatgreater perceived discretion decreased the likelihood ofexperiencing work with migrants as difficult. The resultssuggest that perceived discretion functions as a mediatorfor the relation between perceived workload and difficultyin work with migrants: potentially functioning as a ‘buffer’for organizational pressure. We also found that bureaucratswho hold negative attitudes towards migrants were morelikely to express their work with migrants as more diffi-cult. This paper contributes to the public administrationliterature by increasing our knowledge on how discretion has significance in relation to when bureaucrat’s behaviouris determined by specific organizational and personalfactors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 79, no 4, p. 426-443
Keywords [en]
discretion, migration, quantitative methods, street-level bureaucracy, welfare organizations
National Category
Sociology Social Work
Research subject
Arbete och organisation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-67370DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12410ISI: 000504925000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85078606660OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-67370DiVA, id: diva2:1859824
Available from: 2024-05-22 Created: 2024-05-22 Last updated: 2024-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Schütze, Carolin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schütze, Carolin
In the same journal
Australian journal of public administration
SociologySocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf