Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
School health-care team members’ reflections of their promotion of sexualand reproductive health and rights (SRHR): Important but neglected
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Social Work (SA).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0811-9922
The Swedish Association for Sexuality Education, RFSU, Malmö, Sweden.
Malmö University, Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies (CSS). Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Social Work (SA). Department of Behavioural Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5637-5106
2024 (English)In: Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare, ISSN 1877-5756, E-ISSN 1877-5764, Vol. 39, article id 100950Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Young people are prioritized regarding the promotion and safeguarding of sexual and reproductivehealth and rights – SRHR. In Sweden, the school is seen as an important arena with members of the school healthcare or SHC team as vital actors in this work. This study explored SRHR-related work in SHC teams in Sweden.

Methods: Within an explorative qualitative design, structured interviews were conducted with 33 nurses, counsellors, SHC unit managers and headmasters. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied, and two main themesfound.

Results: SHC team members see SRHR as an urgent topic, but address it only ‘when necessary’, not systematically– and they experience a shortage of guidance and cooperation regarding SRHR-related work. Even in a countrywith agreement on the importance of SRHR for all and on providing holistic comprehensive sex education inschools, young people are left to chance – i.e., to the SRHR competence in the professionals they meet.

Conclusion: SHC team members in Sweden see SRHR as an urgent topic but do not address it systematically.Moreover, they experience a shortage of guidance for their work. To avoid any professional stress of conscienceand for equitable school health care regarding SRHR to be realized, research-informed policy needs to underlinesystematic, comparable and proactive practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 39, article id 100950
Keywords [en]
Ethical stress, Health equity, Health promotion, Sexuality
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-65853DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100950ISI: 001182184800001PubMedID: 38335840Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85184742859OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-65853DiVA, id: diva2:1836500
Funder
Public Health Agency of Sweden Available from: 2024-02-09 Created: 2024-02-09 Last updated: 2024-04-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Arvidsson, AnnaLindroth, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arvidsson, AnnaLindroth, Malin
By organisation
Department of Social Work (SA)Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies (CSS)
In the same journal
Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 454 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf