Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A collective alternative to the Inward Turn in environmental sustainability research
Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3837-3510
Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, ISSN 2190-6483, E-ISSN 2190-6491, Vol. 12, no 2, p. 291-297Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It has become quite common in environmental sustainability research to promote the influencing of so-called inner dimensions of individuals as means to address pressing environmental problems such as climate change, what we refer to as the Inward Turn. We argue that the conceptual foundations of the Inward Turn, an extreme form of methodological individualism, limit it significantly as a strategy for addressing climate change and other socially relevant environmental problems. After briefly reviewing major shortcomings with the way the Inward Turn conceptualizes the relationship between individuals and social change, including its neglect of causal structures and propensity to abstract its analysis away from problems that are specific to place and time, we sketch the basic tenets of an alternative methodological approach capable of overcoming these limitations. Our approach, however, does not go to the other extreme and neglect the role of individuals; rather, our recognition of the structural drivers of particular environmental problems points to the necessity of specific collective actions by individuals, for example, in the practice of social movements. This recognition demands a rethinking of the role of individual factors, like emotion and empathy, in addressing environmental sustainability problems, namely as they relate to collective action/social movement emergence, development, and outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2022. Vol. 12, no 2, p. 291-297
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-59559DOI: 10.1007/s13412-021-00738-6ISI: 000722792000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85119984290OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-59559DiVA, id: diva2:1757306
Available from: 2023-05-16 Created: 2023-05-16 Last updated: 2023-07-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Boda, Chad S

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Boda, Chad S
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf