Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychophysical evaluation of somatosensory function in orofacial pain: achievements and challenges
University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Aarhus, Denmark; Bauru Orofacial Pain Group, Bauru, Brazil.
Bauru Orofacial Pain Group, Bauru, Brazil; University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Bauru Orofacial Pain Group, Bauru, Brazil; University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD). Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5809-8037
2021 (English)In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, E-ISSN 1365-2842, Vol. 48, no 9, p. 1066-1076Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: This critical review describes key methodological aspects for a successful orofacial psychophysical evaluation of the somatosensory system and highlights the diagnostic value of somatosensory assessment and management perspectives based on somatosensory profiling.

METHODS: This topical review was based on a non-systematic search for studies about somatosensory evaluation in orofacial pain in PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS: The recent progress regarding psychophysical evaluation of somatosensory function was largely possible due to the development and application of valid, reliable, and standardized psychophysical methods. Qualitative sensory testing may be useful as a screening tool to rule out relevant somatosensory abnormalities. Nevertheless, the patient should preferably be referred to a more comprehensive assessment with the quantitative sensory testing battery if confirmation of somatosensory abnormalities is necessary. Moreover, the identification of relevant somatosensory alterations in chronic pain disorders that do not fulfill the current criteria to be regarded as neuropathic has also increased the usefulness of somatosensory evaluation as a feasible method to better characterize the patients and perhaps elucidate some underpinnings of the so-called "nociplastic" pain disorders. Finally, an additional benefit of orofacial pain treatment based on somatosensory profiling still needs to be demonstrated and convincing evidence of somatosensory findings as predictors of treatment efficacy in chronic orofacial pain awaits further studies.

CONCLUSION: Psychophysical evaluation of somatosensory function in orofacial pain is still in its infancy but with a clear potential to continue to improve the assessment, diagnosis and management of orofacial pain patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 48, no 9, p. 1066-1076
Keywords [en]
Classification, Diagnosis, Neuropathic Pain, Orofacial pain, Qualitative sensory testing, Quantitative sensory testing, Sensory threshold, Somatosensory system
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-44602DOI: 10.1111/joor.13223ISI: 000678595700001PubMedID: 34213796Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85111126618OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-44602DiVA, id: diva2:1578766
Available from: 2021-07-07 Created: 2021-07-07 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Svensson, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svensson, Peter
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf