Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Frequency of additional treatments in relation to the number of root filled canals in molar teeth in the Swedish adult population
University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Specialist Clinic for Endodontics, Public Dental Service, Lund,.
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7989-1541
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: International Endodontic Journal, ISSN 0143-2885, E-ISSN 1365-2591, Vol. 54, no 6, p. 826-833Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: To investigate the 5-year frequency of additional treatments in relation to the number of reported root filled canals in molar teeth in Sweden.

METHODOLOGY: The cohort included first and second molars in adult individuals who were registered with a root filling performed in 2009. Treatment codes corresponding to root fillings of teeth with from one up to four root filled canals were identified in the Swedish Social Insurance Agency database. The studied additional treatments were extraction, non-surgical root canal retreatment and endodontic surgery during the subsequent 5 years, identified by corresponding codes for these treatments registered on these specific teeth. Differences in the frequency of additional treatments based on the number of root filled canals were analysed using Chi-square test, and considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

RESULTS: In 2009, root fillings on a first or second molar tooth were registered in 100 720 individuals. The study included 32 901 maxillary first molars (6.4% with four root filled canals), 12 763 maxillary second molars (3.3% with four root filled canals), 37 703 mandibular first molars (19.2% with four root filled canals) and 17 353 mandibular second molars (3.7% with four root filled canals). The total frequency additional treatments was 14.3% (n=14 425) during the 5-year observational period. Additional treatments were more frequent in teeth with 1-3 root filled canals compared to teeth with four root filled canals for maxillary first molars (15.2% vs. 12.7%, p=0.002), maxillary second molars (13.8% vs. 9.1%, p=0.007) and mandibular first molars (14.0% vs. 10.7%, p<0.001) but not mandibular second molars (15.6% vs. 13.7%, p=0.200).

CONCLUSIONS: Over 5 years, 85.7% of the included teeth were not registered with any additional treatments. Maxillary first and second molars and mandibular first molar teeth had a greater frequency of additional treatments when ≤3 root canals were root filled compared to 4 canals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 54, no 6, p. 826-833
Keywords [en]
anatomy, cohort studies, endodontics, registries, root canal therapy, tooth extraction
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-39750DOI: 10.1111/iej.13478ISI: 000615258900001PubMedID: 33460458Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100551930OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-39750DiVA, id: diva2:1521218
Available from: 2021-01-22 Created: 2021-01-22 Last updated: 2024-04-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Pigg, MariaFransson, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pigg, MariaFransson, Helena
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
International Endodontic Journal
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf