Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emancipation Through Participation: A Case Study
Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS).
2020 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Over the past few decades there has been a concerted effort in southern Africa for community based natural resource management (CBNRM) programs. The general premise behind CBNRM allows local communities to be empowered to utilize their surrounding natural resources to facilitate socio-economic growth. This is seen as an effective rural development tool which often takes on the form of eco-tourism in South Africa. It creates a link between nature conservation and socio-economic development needs and is normally built on existing conservation areas such as national parks (Ezeuduji et al. 2017: 225).“Protected area outreach” is a form of CBNRM (Chevallier 2016: 6), and this degree project examines how stakeholder participation was incorporated into the formulation of Kruger National Park’s (KNP) ten-year management plan. Using KNP’s stakeholder engagement process as a naturalistic case study, the aim is to discover the extent of participation and whether true empowerment is facilitated. This was done via document analysis of the 2018 KNP Stakeholder Participation Report using the emancipatory approach. This approach is influenced by critical, post-colonial and intersectional theory and emphasizes the attainment of social justice through the unveiling and dismantling of invisible oppressive power structures (Wesp et al. 2018: 319). The analysis shows that KNP uses a systems approach to their stakeholder engagement as opposed to an empowerment one; that participation is limited to consultation and is therefore merely a form of tokenism; that weaker marginalized stakeholder groups suffer from systemic exclusion and underrepresentation; and that there is little to no attention given to empowerment nor structural reform to drive social change.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö universitet/Kultur och samhälle , 2020. , p. 44
Keywords [en]
participatory development, CBNRM, stakeholder engagement, emancipation approach, systems approach
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-21294Local ID: 32625OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-21294DiVA, id: diva2:1481200
Educational program
KS K3 Communication for development
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-10-27 Created: 2020-10-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(467 kB)518 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 467 kBChecksum SHA-512
de96d366e477455bb212837cdb62b08ed75a9e436f24d61e47bc8e03439def6472223a77de532f1c8164efc0363fe9a29f1f739ad6cafae3936e305f10013f90
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Faculty of Culture and Society (KS)
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 519 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 473 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf