Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Alveolarutskottets vertikala höjd: Finns det skillnader vid mätning i en panorama- jämfört med i en CBCT-röntgenbild? En pilot- och observatörsstudie
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Syfte: Undersöka om skillnad föreligger mellan panorama- och CBCT-röntgen i avseende att bedöma den vertikala höjden av alveolarutskottet vid planering inför implantatbehandling i utvalda regioner. Metod och material: Totalt valdes 68 röntgenbilder, 34 panorama- respektive 34 CBCT-bilder, ut. I samtliga röntgenbilder utfördes mätningar av alveolarutskottets vertikala höjd, vid specifikt utvalda regioner. Observatörerna bestod av fem tandläkarstudenter. Resultat: Både med och utan hänsyn till outliers, visar resultatet en signifikant skillnad mellan de båda röntgenmetoderna. Generellt visas att mätningar i panoramaröntgenbilder återger ett kortare avstånd mellan alveolarutskottets högsta punkt och sinus maxillaris nedre begränsning/foramen mentales övre begränsning jämfört med mätningar i CBCT-röntgenbilderna. Konklusion: Det fanns en signifikant skillnad mellan de båda röntgenmetoderna, denna studie visade att en kortare vertikal benhöjd mättes i panorama- jämfört med i CBCT-röntgenbilder. Resultatet visade att det fanns försumbara interobservatörsskillnader.

Abstract [en]

Purpose: Investigate whether there is a difference between the panoramic and CBCT X-ray in terms of assessing the vertical height of the alveolar ridge when planning for implant treatment in selected regions. Methodology: A total of 68 X-ray images, 34 panoramic and 34 CBCT images, were selected. In all X-ray images, measurements of the vertical height of the alveolar ridge were performed at specifically selected regions. The observers consisted of five dental students. Results: The result of this study shows a significant difference between the two X-ray methodologies. The measurements made in the panoramic pictures shows a shorter distance between the highest point of the alveolar bone and the lowest point of the maxillary sinus (or the upper limitation of the mental foramen) compared to the same measurements made in the CBCT pictures. Conclusion: There was a significant difference between the two X-ray methods, this study shows that a lower vertical bone height was measured in panoramic compared to CBCT X-rays. The result showed that there were insignificant inter-observer differences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö universitet/Odontologiska fakulteten , 2019. , p. 25
Keywords [sv]
X-ray, CBCT, Panoramic
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-19695Local ID: 29759OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-19695DiVA, id: diva2:1479539
Educational program
OD Tandläkarutbildning
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-10-27 Created: 2020-10-27 Last updated: 2022-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(554 kB)398 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 554 kBChecksum SHA-512
2d725a78115f1e811237b0668bca327a777d6e3de23341b4544bda05dfd440ed613df5cb4f795a8bed50366eb13f1e88e9d8ca2deba6ca1584024f900891b954
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 398 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 143 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf