Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Influence of Different Designs, Materials and Cements on the Success and Survival Rate of Endocrowns: A Systematic Review
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6260-473X
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3912-0830
2020 (English)In: European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, ISSN 0965-7452, Vol. 28, p. 100-111Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim is to evaluate the success and survival rate of endocrowns and the influence of design, material and cements. A search of clinical trials of endocrowns was performed using three databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, CochraneLibrary), complemented by a manual search. The search resulted in 2,718 studies, six of which were included for analysis. The follow-up times were 2-12 years. Feldspathic porcelain was the material of choice cemented with different adhesive resin cement systems. Designs varied significantly. In total, the six studies represented 471 endocrowns. Thirty-six of these failed. Most common failures were loss of retention and fracture. Due to insufficient information on timing of events and drop-out, no statistical analysis was performed. No conclusive correlation between design, material, cement and success or survival of endocrowns could be established. Signs of differences in survival rates between molar and premolar endocrowns were noted, with a tendency towards higher survival rates for molar endocrowns. Feldspathic ceramic endocrowns with adhesive cementation demonstrate promising clinical performance. These conclusions are however based on a limited number of studies of comparatively low quality. Further studies are thus needed to verify the conclusions and to provide guidance in the clinical decision on best choice of materials, design and cements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dennis Barber Journals , 2020. Vol. 28, p. 100-111
Keywords [en]
Adhesive Cementation, Dental Restoration, Endocrowns, Non-Vital Tooth
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-18022DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_1992Papia12ISI: 000591503000001PubMedID: 32645260Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85090295481OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-18022DiVA, id: diva2:1458750
Available from: 2020-08-18 Created: 2020-08-18 Last updated: 2024-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Papia, EvaggeliaLarsson, Christel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Papia, EvaggeliaLarsson, Christel
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 156 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf