Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A life cycle assessment of a 'minus carbon' refugee house: global warming potential and sensitivity analysis
Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US). Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Technical Faculty of IT and Design, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7754-0927
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Univ Iceland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Reykjavik, Iceland.;Innovat Ctr Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland..
2020 (English)In: Archnet-IJAR : International Journal of Architectural Research, ISSN 1994-6961, E-ISSN 1938-7806, Vol. 14, no 3, p. 559-579Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose - Over the last eight years, the Middle East has experienced a series of high profile conflicts which have resulted in over 5.6 million Syrians forced to migrate to neighbouring countries within the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region or to Europe. That have exerted huge pressure on hosting countries trying to accommodate refugees in decent shelters and in quick manner. Temporary shelters normally carry a high environmental burden due to their short lifespan, and the majority are fabricated from industrialised materials. This study assesses the carbon impact for a minus carbon experimental refugee house in Sweden using life cycle assessment (LCA) as tool. SimaPro and GaBi software were used for the calculations and the ReCiPe midpoint method for impact assessment. The results show that using local plant-based materials such as straw, reeds and wood, together with clay dug from close to the construction site, can drastically reduce the carbon footprint of temporary shelters and even attain a negative carbon impact of 226.2 kg CO2 eq/m2. Based on the results of the uncertainty importance analysis, the overall global warming potential impact without and with sequestration potential are mostly sensitive to the variability of the GWP impact of wood fibre insulation. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is designed to calculate the GWP impact of the refugee house over its entire life cycle (production, operation and maintenance and end of life). Then, the sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of input uncertainties (selection of material from the database and the method) on the total GWP impact of the refugee house with and without sequestration. The ISO standards (International Standard 14040 2006; International Standard 14044 2006) divide the LCA framework into four steps of Goal and scope, inventory analysis, impact assessment, and interpretation. Findings - This study has shown an example for proof of concept for a low impact refugee house prototype using straw, reeds, clay, lime and wood as the principle raw materials for building construction. Using natural materials, especially plant-based fibres, as the main construction materials, proved to achieve a minus carbon outcome over the life cycle of the building. The GWP of the shelter house without and with sequestration are found to be 254.7 kg CO2 eq/m(2) and -226.2 kg CO2 eq/m(2), respectively. Originality/value - As there are still very few studies concerned with the environmental impact of temporary refugee housing, this study contributes to the pool of knowledge by introducing a complete LCA calculation for a physical house prototype as a proof of concept on how using low impact raw materials for construction combined with passive solutions for heating and cooling can reach a minus carbon outcome. The GWP of the shelter house without and with sequestration are found to be 254.7 kg CO2 eq/m2 and -226.2 kg CO2 eq/m2.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2020. Vol. 14, no 3, p. 559-579
Keywords [en]
LCA, Minus carbon, GHG, Refugee housing, Urban living lab
National Category
Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-17910DOI: 10.1108/ARCH-11-2019-0258ISI: 000551437200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85087652516OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-17910DiVA, id: diva2:1457859
Available from: 2020-08-13 Created: 2020-08-13 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Dabaieh, Marwa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dabaieh, Marwa
By organisation
Department of Urban Studies (US)
In the same journal
Archnet-IJAR : International Journal of Architectural Research
Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 318 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf