Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are the American normative standard scores applicable to the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)?
School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Malmö University, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV). School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8976-2612
2021 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN 1103-8128, E-ISSN 1651-2014, Vol. 28, no 2, p. 110-120Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) is an assessment to evaluate children’s performance in activities of daily living.

Aims: The study investigated if the normative standard scores of the PEDI are applicable to the German version of the PEDI (PEDI-G) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and whether there are differences in the applicability of the PEDI-G between the three countries.

Materials and methods: 75 children with normal development (35 girls, 40 boys) from Germany (n = 17), Austria (n = 16), and Switzerland (n = 42) aged between 0.9 month and 7.3 years (SD = 2.03) participated in the study. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, univariate analyses of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests were applied.

Results: No significant differences were identified. However, the German-speaking sample showed higher scores for the domain social function in both scales and in the Caregiver Assistance Scale self-care. Lower scores were identified in the Functional Skills Scale mobility.

Conclusions and significance: The results support that the normative standard scores of the PEDI are applicable to the PEDI-G and for Austria, Germany and Switzerland, as no significant differences between the countries were identified. However, the generalizability of the results is limited due to sample size and recruitment procedures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021. Vol. 28, no 2, p. 110-120
Keywords [en]
Child, caregivers, child pre-school, reference values
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-14210DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1726452ISI: 000518247900001PubMedID: 32116081Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85080982063OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-14210DiVA, id: diva2:1420607
Available from: 2020-03-31 Created: 2020-03-31 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kottorp, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kottorp, Anders
By organisation
Department of Care Science (VV)
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 41 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf