Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants
Gothenburg Univ, Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
Univ Ghent, Sch Dent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Periodontol & Oral Implantol, Ghent, Belgium.
Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2017 (English)In: Periodontology 2000, ISSN 0906-6713, E-ISSN 1600-0757, Vol. 73, no 1, p. 41-50Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Successful osseointegration is the result of a controlled foreign body reaction to dental implants. Osseointegrated implants have demonstrated excellent long-term survivability, although they may be subject to limited marginal bone loss. Marginal bone loss during the first few years after implant placement seldom represents disease, but is instead the result of an adaptive bone response to surgical trauma and implant loading. It is not uncommon for implants with early marginal bone loss to enter a long-lasting state of bone stability. Extensive bone resorption after the first year is generally due to an exacerbation of adverse body reactions caused by non-optimal implant components, adverse surgery or prosthodontics and/or compromised patient factors. Disease in the form of peri-implantitis is a late complication that affects some implants with suppuration and rapid loss of crestal bone, and is probably caused by bacterial pathogens and immunological reactions. Unfortunately, the literature is not consistent with respect to the type or magnitude of clinical implant problems, including how they are defined and diagnosed. If the peri-implantitis diagnosis is confined to cases with infection, suppuration and significant bone loss, the frequency of the disease is relatively low, which is in sharp contrast to the frequencies reported with unrealistic definitions of peri-implantitis. We suggest that when modern implants are placed by properly trained individuals, only 1–2% of implants show true peri-implantitis during follow-up periods of 10 years or more. Peri-implantitis must be separated from the initial and self-limiting marginal bone loss.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2017. Vol. 73, no 1, p. 41-50
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-16210DOI: 10.1111/prd.12176ISI: 000392827600003PubMedID: 28000272Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85006797331Local ID: 22079OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-16210DiVA, id: diva2:1419726
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Albrektsson, TomasChrcanovic, Bruno

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Albrektsson, TomasChrcanovic, Bruno
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Periodontology 2000
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf