Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Immunological aspects of fresh-frozen allogeneic bone grafting for lateral ridge augmentation
Department of Periodontology, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara Dental School, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Dentistry – Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Dentistry – Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Center for Experimental and Preclinical Biomedical Research (CEPBR), Athens, Greece.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8161-3754
Department of Periodontology, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara Dental School, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Dentistry – Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Histology and Embryology, UNICAMP – State University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 24, no 9, p. 963�-968Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: To present some immunological aspects of fresh-frozen allogeneic bone grafting for lateral bone augmentation, based on the quantitative evaluation of IL-10, IL-1β, IFN- γ and TNF- α in patients sera. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three partially or totally edentulous patients received fresh-frozen allogeneic bone (AL - 20 patients) or autologous bone onlay block grafts (AT - 13 patients) prior to oral implant placement. Blood samples were collected from each patient at various time-points during a 6 month-period (baseline, 14, 30, 90 and 180 days postoperatively). Quantitative evaluation of IL-10, IL-1β, IFN- γ and TNF- α was performed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: For all evaluated markers and at all evaluated periods, inter-group comparisons showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, while the observed values were within normal levels. For AL-treated patients, intra-group evaluation showed statistically significant increase of TNF-α from baseline to 90 (P < 0.001) and 180 (P < 0.01) days, and from 14 to 90 (P < 0.01) and 180 (P < 0.05) days. IFN- γ showed intercalated results, with a decrease from baseline to 14 days (P < 0.05), and increase from 14 to 90 days (P < 0.001) and 180 (P < 0.05) days. No differences between the periods of evaluation were found for the AT group. CONCLUSIONS: AL grafting for lateral bone augmentation, similar to AT grafting, does not seem to challenge the immune system significantly

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Vol. 24, no 9, p. 963�-968
Keywords [en]
ELISA, bone allograft, bone autograft, immunological evaluation, ridge augmentation
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15935DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02510.xISI: 000322203500002PubMedID: 22697457Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84880821871Local ID: 16299OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15935DiVA, id: diva2:1419457
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Stavropoulos, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stavropoulos, Andreas
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf