Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reproducibility of intraoral photography for pink and white tissue assessment: Is it worth the hassle?
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD). Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8279-7943
Division of Orthodontics, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karl Donath Laboratory for Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical and Experimental Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Journal of Prosthodontic Research, ISSN 1883-1958, E-ISSN 2212-4632, Vol. 63, no 4, p. 404-410Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of the shooting angle variation on linear and planimetric measurements of the pink and white tissues on intraoral photographs. METHODS: From intraoral three-dimensional (3D) scans of the anterior region in 10 patients, ninety-nine two-dimensional (2D) "scan pictures" each were generated with different shooting angles, each varying in 5° horizontal and vertical increments. Eleven intraoral photographs of each patient and tooth site were taken free-hand: one shot at baseline and 5 shots after 3 and 6 months at slightly varying shooting angles. Papilla height (PH) and area (PA) and tooth crown area (TCA) were estimated on all photographs; the "best-match-to-baseline" photograph from those taken at 3 and 6 months was chosen by 6 evaluators. RESULTS: Within the first 10° of deviation from the baseline shooting angle, measurements on the 2D "scan pictures" distorted ≤0.5 mm for PH and ≤10% for PA and TCA. Compared to baseline, only 6 out of 100 photographs presented ≥0.5 mm difference in PH, none of the TCA measurements showed distortion ≥10%, and only in 4 instances a ≥10% distortion of the PA was observed. Poor to moderate inter- and intra-rater agreement in choosing the "best-match-to-baseline" photograph was found, but photographs with clinically relevant changes were only seldomly chosen. CONCLUSIONS: Deviations in the shooting angle ≤10° from the baseline shot cause clinically negligible distortions in linear and planimetric measurements. Highly comparable intraoral photographs of the anterior maxillary teeth can be captured "free-hand" in slightly varying perspective, and then selecting the "best-match-to-baseline".

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 63, no 4, p. 404-410
Keywords [en]
Distortion, Intraoral photograph, Intraoral scan, Reliability, Reproducibility, Shooting angle
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15895DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.001ISI: 000493337600004PubMedID: 31053442Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064878631Local ID: 28584OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15895DiVA, id: diva2:1419417
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bertl, KristinaStavropoulos, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bertl, KristinaStavropoulos, Andreas
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf